This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
yrger · 80-89, M
Hi LordShadowfire, my research consists in intelligent rational thinking and thinking and thinking.
Let you start with thinking on the question has there always been a being, instead of no being, and the answer is obvious, of course there has always been a being.
The opposite is unthinkable, why? Because then we would not be here and now discussing God exists or not.
====================
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@yrger Yet you refuse to show your research.
Let you start with thinking on the question has there always been a being, instead of no being, and the answer is obvious, of course there has always been a being.
The opposite is unthinkable, why? Because then we would not be here and now discussing God exists or not.
====================
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@yrger Yet you refuse to show your research.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@yrger
In what way are those two assertions connected?
You’re making the bifurcation fallacy... there is only A and B
Butt that’s simply not so.
Have you really not learned to use the ‘reply’ button You expect people to listen to whatever you assert, yet you cannot master a simple ‘reply’ button? 😂
there has always been a being... The opposite is unthinkable, why? Because then we would not be here
In what way are those two assertions connected?
You’re making the bifurcation fallacy... there is only A and B
Butt that’s simply not so.
Have you really not learned to use the ‘reply’ button You expect people to listen to whatever you assert, yet you cannot master a simple ‘reply’ button? 😂
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@newjaninev2
In what way are those two assertions connected?
Ikr? Yet he claims to have arrived at his conclusion through "rational thought". 😆
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@LordShadowfire
Oh shit, bruh. You know he means business when he had to think three times!
rational thinking and thinking and thinking
Oh shit, bruh. You know he means business when he had to think three times!
DocSavage · M
@newjaninev2
If he uses the reply , he runs the risk of a quick and humiliating response.
He likes to think he’s been clever.
If he uses the reply , he runs the risk of a quick and humiliating response.
He likes to think he’s been clever.