This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueSkyKing · M
This is a scientific argument against the existence of God, a modified form of the lack-of-evidence argument:
1. Hypothesize a God who plays an important role in the universe.
2. Assume that God has specific attributes that should provide [u]objective evidence[/u] for his existence.
3. Look for such evidence with an open mind.
4. If such evidence is found, conclude that God [b]may[/b] exist.
5. If such objective evidence is not found, conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a God with these properties [b]does not[/b] exist.
1. Hypothesize a God who plays an important role in the universe.
2. Assume that God has specific attributes that should provide [u]objective evidence[/u] for his existence.
3. Look for such evidence with an open mind.
4. If such evidence is found, conclude that God [b]may[/b] exist.
5. If such objective evidence is not found, conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a God with these properties [b]does not[/b] exist.