Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am Not Romantic

Romance is OK for teenagers or maybe for the very young. But I wince when I read a romantic rant on here by anyone declaring an age over 30. It seems inappropriate and immature. Especially those situations in which the people involved have never actually met and have only texted or talked over the phone. Real love doesn't happen until you have actually met someone in person and spent significant amounts of time with them. You can "fall in love" at first sight, of course. I understand that very intense attractions happen. But that is not really love in any sense that I understand it. I don't really feel comfortable with words like "soulmate" if they are used by someone beyond their earliest dating years. They sound silly and meaningless to me. I always hesitate to post this kind of response to anyone having a cloud nine romantic fantasy. I know they won't like it and that a lot of angry people here will see me as a joy killer. I know I have had an unusually unhappy life in this and in other respects, so I am hardly wise or objective about these kinds of over the top love rants. But, then, neither are the people that post them.
I think romance is not just for the young, it's for every age to enjoy, I'm sorry you feel differently...
greenmountaingal · 70-79, F
@Somewhereovertherainbow It's OK with me if others are enjoying it, I think that's wonderful and I am sad I've never been there myself, but I admit I like to see it between two people who've known each other for more than a couple of chats online or over the phone.
@greenmountaingal oh if it's only a couple of chats then I agree with you... it takes time to develope into true love...
SW-User
Having experienced online dating at its best here, I have to agree with you in a way. That relationship does not fully transform into true love unless the partners meet in person. Perhaps that is why I was never able to hold that relationship
And this is also not something you can generally say without being dismissed as “old and bitter”. So people either find it out by being catfished and become sadder and wiser—or—occasionally, they [b]do[/b] make a real connection and find some kind of happiness. But [b]that[/b] is unlikely to happen for those [b]announcing[/b] that they’re here looking or that they’ve found it.
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@greenmountaingal 💐 You are welcome.
greenmountaingal · 70-79, F
@CharlieZ Nowhere in my post did I blame my many disappointments in love on anyone. I take full responsibility for the many times I have been a fool. Maybe that's why I find superficial immature romantic rants annoying.
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@greenmountaingal Never said you did.
After all, each one bleeds (and rant) from his own bleeds.

But, only as a personal stand for, I reserve the quality of frivolous and inmature for the rants that theorize that individuality isolated from love is the hallmark of maturity.
Ok, I also leave part of the adjective for ideas like: "heal and put in the past", "you can only control yourself", all the "self whatever" collection, and for the word "acceptance".
And for the snake oil a la mode therapies.
cd4259 · 61-69, M
I have to disagree with you. I am 60yo and have found true love again and am as strongly in love now as I was in my 20's. Love knows no age limit.
greenmountaingal · 70-79, F
@cd4259 I agree that love has no age limit. But I think immature teenage sounding rants from people who have never actually met should.
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
"...a second time of naiveté, that comes to believe in nothing, in nothing"🎼 From a lyrics of Joan Manuel Serrat.
SW-User
What is love to you? What does it mean to you?
greenmountaingal · 70-79, F
@SW-User I admit I am not really sure. But raving about someone you barely know at all is not it.
SW-User
@greenmountaingal True. Raving about someone we barely know at all is not love. It is just a fantasy that has no realistic view.

Love needs time. We have to keep our mind awake and aware of someone before we can truly know if that person is love or not. But love is not something that you think is mostly about negativity. Romance and love tend to get along, and there is nothing wrong if people who are not teenagers can be related to it. Love has no rule, people can love the way they want it to be. And love is about connection, not about reason or facts. I love the word soulmate, but I would only consider someone who is truly my soulmate if I get to know that person well. I don't believe in love with social media. I like to found love when I see in person, not see through words.

You say that you have an unusual unhappy life, which makes you view about love that way. People who usually unhappy with life tend to see things negatively; even things that consider as one of the happiest things to life could be seen as negative under their eyes.

The way you see life will affect the way life treat you because life is you. You are the one who observes yourself, and life observes you. So whatever you think, you do; it will imitate you. And it will show the result of what it copies you and imitating you. And you will understand why your life happens that way.
You can only fall in love at first sight if you’ve actually seen each other smh
You need some romance. Its fun lol
greenmountaingal · 70-79, F
@DarlingSelah I agree. It can be fun if not taken too seriously. (I'm thinking of those people on Dr.Phil who send hundreds of thousands of dollars to people in foreign countries because they're "in love with a wonderful person.")
happiness is merely a part of a dream tbh!
Wiseacre · F
I'm not, either..romance is for making babies!

 
Post Comment