Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Like Philosophy

Either nothing came from nothing, or something came from something else...

Given the fact we know we already exist, we're left with little to no choice but to assume that the universe at least came from... something. What it was exactly is anyone's guess. We know it wasn't nothing though, because we're already here. And if nothing - true absolute nothing - was the original state of everything prior to the creation and existence of space and time, then it would simply continue being nothing ad infinitum. 0+0=0. That's just the most logical deduction one could make. But, if nothing can spontaneously produce something then that original nothingness was not nothing at all, but in fact a something.

It's hard - if not impossible - to imagine a universe in its formative years, especially when conscious beings weren't even on the scene yet. This of course begs the obvious question; How does a universe exist in spite of our perception of it, when perception itself is the very means in which reality becomes manifest?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FocusReborn · 26-30, M
K10vvn - How can the universe be without a cause, and yet "start" to exist at the big bang? If the universe is truly eternal, THEN it can be cause-less. But if it suddenly began to exist, and we're saying it needs no prior cause at all, then we're basically suggesting that the universe brought itself into existence - which contradicts the very nature of what pure nothingness is. 0+0=0. It will never equal anything other than zero. The multiverse theory seems like a convenient way for us to avoid the problematic nature of our current universe. It does little to explain anything. It's merely convenient and obviously theoretical in nature.