Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

George Orwell - Review of "Mein Kampf" (1940) [I Like a Good Quote]

[quote][b]Also [Hitler] has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues.[/b] The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. [b]Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades.[/b] However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. [b]Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet.[/b] Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. [b]After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.[/b]

- George Orwell - [i]Review of "Mein Kampf"[/i] (1940)[/quote]

Dostoyvskys' view on a similair toppic (1864): https://similarworlds.com/4429978-I-Like-a-Good-Quote/3855173-Fyodor-Dostoyevsky-Notes-From-the-Underground-1864
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
This is misleading and a pet peeve of mine.

Orwell was a radical leftist, a socialist, and most importantly anti-authoritarian.

When he's writing stuff like this, he is attempting to tell other people on the left that Stalin is a monster and cannot be
separated so easily from Hitler because they are both dictators.

That [b]authoritarian[/b] left politics may as well be fascism for all the good it does the people.

But Orwell was an [b]anti-authoritarian leftist[/b] and remained so his entire life.

Orwell was not a centrist, capitalist, or liberal. For the love of God he literally joined with the communists in the Spanish civil war to go fight fascists as a volunteer, and he fought and killed people.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@basilfawlty89 It was a direct quote from his essay. There is no agenda you fuckwit. It's just a quote. There is no other context delivered, so you don't have to make shit up.

Sure, you can see all of that, because a social democracy isn't a utopia. It's just a phase that allows progress later on when people are with the program. Instead of radically implementing a program and expect people to just adopt to it as if that is ever going to happen. Societies don't change over night, because people don't change over night. That's why, a number of left wingers at the beginning of the 20 centrury came up with this concept of a Vanguard party in the first place, because they were frustrated that the prophecies didn't materialise. So instead of getting from A to B in a democratic sense, they let an elite clique dictate what people should do and those that didn't were just removed from society. Because if you want to put a round shape in a square hole, you either hammer it in there or throw it out with the rest of the garbage that doesn't fit the mold that the utopic thinker uses.
@CountScrofula The idea of him just being an "anti authoritarian leftist" is also a bit misleading because one thing he was also later famous for was ratting out other leftists to MI5.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow We contain multitudes. He can be a snitch and a leftist at the same time.
SW-User
I think some of you are misinterpreting this quote if your takeaway from it is "socialism bad, capitalism good". That is not what he's saying. He's saying that authoritarianism has an appeal in that it gives people a sense of patriotism, gives them a struggle and something to sacrifice for. It taps into base human instincts. Western society in promising only comfort and ease does not satisfy the variety of human needs and desires. He does not agree with Hitler. He simply understands why Hitler had an appeal and that we should keep that appeal in mind while we fight him (since he was writing when Hitler's power was at its peak).
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@SW-User Well, you earn your nickname. You actually read the post and your mind didn't add things. Good job!
val70 · 51-55
Thank you for this posting! Brilliant. Only a couple of years ago I had to argue in an academic setting why Nazism and Italy's late Facism era were indeed different to the regimes in Portugal and Spain, and even Greece after world war two. Somehow they got stuck onto the elements that say Nazism is Socialism or that every authorian regime is like Hitler's. The mind boggles at times. I had to write page after page, and argue the case again and again. And those were indeed academics.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 As I wrote, it really depends on your definition of socialism.

But the only reason why people are getting triggered here is because they are on the left wing. I never said annything about fascism or national-socialism being on the left wing. People shouldn't feel personally attacked because they identify themselves as a left-wing socialist.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Human1000 Aren't these people listening to philosophers then? Even the far-right has a pretty big pool of writers too choose from. To name a few, in the European Right: Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Martin Heidegger and Nietzsche are all incorperated in their new projects. Not to mention certain aspects of Gramscis' ideas on hegemony has been a corner stone in the project that started in the 70s in France.
Human1000 · M
@Kwek00 the usual suspects!
SW-User
Anyone who has an understanding of history should know it's ridiculous to think humans only want ease. Humans are naturally warlike. Human nature doesn't change. Just because life has been "secure" for longer than in the past doesn't mean our warlike tendencies are gone. We want struggle and something to fight for and we are naturally belligerent and competitive (which is part of why socialism will never work). That is not me saying "humanity is depraved" or whatever. We are simply complicated and don't only want peace and security. Peace and security bring restlessness. And restlessness finds an outlet.
bugeye · 26-30, F
"Better an end with horror than a horror without end"

That's a nice quote right there. part of me always wanted to read it at least once. just out of a morbid curiosity of what it actually says.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@bugeye He used a similair idea in 1984.

[quote]There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always— do not forget this, Winston— always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.

[b]If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever.[/b]

- George Orwell, [i]1984[/i][/quote]

The vision of eternal struggle, and continously reaching for power and greatness... BY THE INDIVIDUAL or by a clique of thinkers. Because the concept of "humanity" is the enemy of those kinds of thinkers. In Fascism, "humanity" as a concept, does not excist. There is only the state and the state represents the nation. The nation is the state, and the state is the nation. And everyone else is an enemy even when they are potential allies for a brief moment in time, they will never be trully friends.

Hence, the human or humanity, will have to endure the eternal struggle of a small group seeking for continuous victories and greatness. A boot stamping on a human face, forever.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
Its interesting. Richard Seymour, who nobody has heard of but is a genius, links Fascism to the Freudian death drive.

I think there might be something to that. Also, the apeal if submerging your individualism behind collective goal. Liberation of desires by following gut instict and freedom by not having to think.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MalteseFalconPunch Seymour is contemporary. Hes a british marxist intellectual influenced by Freud. Im one of his Patreons.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MalteseFalconPunch

https://www.redpepper.org.uk/the-nationalist-unconscious/

The whole article is good. Stuff about the Death Drive is from halfway down.
Human1000 · M
Unfortunately, liberalism is getting hit from both sides now.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Human1000 In the time that this was written, it actually got hit from both sides too.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@Kwek00 @Human1000 that's hot
SW-User
A brilliant analysis. As usual, Orwell was absolutely spot on when he wrote this.

 
Post Comment