Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What's better, having no arms or having no legs?

A simple question today.
Top | New | Old
SW-User
Well seriously Its better to have no legs than no arms at all. Salute to this guy!
SW-User
Still better than no pus** 😫
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
see I got a supprter. Thanks saint pierre
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Fishy · 36-40, F
I could still work at a desk job if I had no legs...
A bit more difficult if I had no arms.
abe182 · 51-55, M
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
DanielChristensen · 46-50, M
Opposable thumbs are infinitely useful. I had to add opposable to my stupid puter's dictionary.
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M
No arms because no legs would mean no feet. 😢
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M
@NearMiss: the feet would still be fantastic but the person wouldn't look all that great. Lol

 
Post Comment