What's better, having no arms or having no legs?

A simple question today.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M

No arms because no legs would mean no feet. 😢

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M

@NearMiss: the feet would still be fantastic but the person wouldn't look all that great. Lol