What do you think about a girl who punches a guy in the face?

@redredred [quote]strong prohibition of men using greater size and strength to brutalize women.[/quote]
What about strong women using their greater size and strength to brutalize men? Is that OK in your book?

@Sharon No, I thought I made it clear that women hitting men constitutes an assault on the civilized rules of conduct for both sexes. I taught martial arts for fifteen years, I'm a third dan black belt. I had many skilled, hard working female students. Its very politically incorrect to say but most women would do poorly in a physical fight against a man unless their size and condition were very much in favor of the woman.

The first premise of libertarianism is this, "Initiate no force against another". I think thats a good rule for all of us but its important to note that the most significant word in that premise is "initiate"; be ready to hit back if necessary.

@approachingmyexpirationdate What circumstances justifies her punching a guy [b]just because she was pissed off[/b]?

@suzie1960 sorry, I missed the last part.
if she isn't defending herself from a physical assault she should just tell him why she's pissed and walk off

@Pherick I don't see any reason why he shouldn't defend himself exactly as he would if attacked by a man. It's called equality.

@suzie1960 Averages on physical structures are build on usually serious non biased population meassures.
And they reflect a biological / evolutive reality. They also show that gender differeces trend to decrease along time.

How does gender (masculinity/femininity) affect physical structure?
It´s called dimorphism and is rather biology than culture.

No doubt there are things severly biased by sociological constructions!!
Most of opresive prejudices are!
Not at all the case we are talking about.

Of course a six foot tall woman is obviusly taller than a a five foot man!!
How can I or anyone say otherwise?

May once Pa Kua female professor (sifu) of about 5 foot tall could easily beat simultaneously FOUR 6 foot tall trained men.

And there are thousands and millions of examples of examples like that.

Even so, science is always about the specific of collective group entities and not about individual cases.

Please, don´t dig for sexist conceptions in my worldview. There are not.

But the idea of gender neutrality instead of gender equality IS a recent "social construction" and not an accurate nor even well possed one.

@CharlieZ You seem to be confusing gender with sex. A person of the female sex is not necessarily of the feminine gender.

If you need a tall person to do a job, pick a tall person of either sex, not a short man just because men are taller on average.

@suzie1960 I´m guilty of sometimes using sex and gender as if the same thing, you are right and I´m wrong in this language stuff.

Of course, if choosing on an individual basis, I have no prejudices in selecting either women or men.
Would be about their personal stuff regardless sex, gender or other irelevant distinctions.

But if prepearing, let´s say clothes for a large group outdoor activity where individualities are not known a priori, I would certainly know at least the proportion of the group about gender / sex composition (from the same population origin) to make a better size bet.

Lol, I don’t. Grow the fuck up

@MrAboo You obviously do. You think you're being big but you're just a misogynist piece of shit. You can fuck off and play with your misogynist "real men/arseholes"!

@MrAboo You're just a sexist with no real respect for anything or anyone.

@gjp63 A lot of women play on that. They get really offended when they're proven wrong. ;)