Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can anyone tell me why

Painting BLM isn't considered vandalism, but it's considered a hate crime for someone to paint over it? I honestly don't understand this. To me it's considered a hate crime to have BLM on a street I have to see everyday. And vandalizing statues seam to be overlooked.
AlienZipper · 61-69, M Best Comment
Welcome to the world of "what's okay for me to do isn't okay for you to do"....

Black lives only matter when killed by a white cop.

WTF do you blacks have against obeying a cops orders instead of trying to flee or fight the cop when you are confronted?

You're in a lose/lose situation.

Black lives don't seem to matter in the city I live in. They're killing each other every fucking day and don't think nothing of it.
The last time I checked painting is not a crime.
curiosi · 61-69, F
For the same reason that couple in St. Louis are facing charges for defending themselves while the rioters who threatened them walk free, threatening others. The libs have gone rouge and they wish to destroy this country.
I don't know if I can explain it adequately.

Throughout history, segments of society that have been repressed or minimized have erupted violently and loudly when they see a chance to truly change things.

I'm sure it happened earlier, but the first incident that comes to mind is the slave rebellion against Rome led by Spartacus almost 2100 years ago - 71 BC.

That was a lot bloodier than graffiti in public places and it was not a racial movement. Slaves then were often captives taken after one of Rome's many many battles to take new lands.

The lesson we need to learn is that revolts don't stop permanently until change takes place permanently. It's a lesson we (whoever the suppressing class is) ignore at our peril.

BLM is meant to keep "you are doing wrong and you are allowing wrong to be done" ringing in our heads.

Another translation could be "every symbol of your comfort and complacency" is a target, until we too are consistently invited to every privilege and opportunity.

It seems a fair idea to me.
SubstantialKick · 31-35, M
It depends on the reason [b]why[/b] it was painted over. Maybe the person doesn't think that us black people are humans and our lives matter too?
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SubstantialKick Possibly, but they could simply and quite rightly not have wanted [i]any[/i] graffiti there, irrespective of what it is or of any cause.

[Edited for typo.]
@ArishMell And if it’s [b]their[/b] property they’re removing it from, they won’t be in trouble. In my state, the couple who painted over a “Black Lives Matter” mural didn’t own the property and it had been posted with permission.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@bijouxbroussard Oh, I take your point - yes it should be left alone [i]if [/i]genuinely artistic and by the property owner's permission. Mere slogans are not murals, whatever they are trying to say, and are shabby.

The OP made no mention of any mural or permission, just a slogan painted as mere graffito, and most graffiti are unauthorised and messy.
SW-User
Because murals aren't considered vandalism. They're approved by a city council and mayor. For someone to paint over a mural without the authority to do so is vandalism.
Rose0415 · 36-40, F
Because black lives do matter and society needs to get that?
@melissa001 And whites kill more whites than Black people do.

There is no specifically "black on black violence." People tend to commit crimes in their neighborhoods, more often against people of their own group. You people bring up "black on black violence" as a diversion. There's also "white on white violence," "Latino on Latino violence," "Asian on Asian violence," etc. Instead of using that as a cudgel to attack Black people, why don't you bring up interracial violence among other people? Answer - because you're a racist piece of shit.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@melissa001 And thats their own fault, and their own issue. It has nothing to do with a political catch phrase that is designed and owned by whites. 🙂
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@melissa001 Numbers are not important, because you probably dont wanna know the real numbers anyway if you actually knew. 🙂
SW-User
If they have a permit to paint it, it's not vandalism. It would depend on the individual case.
melissa001 · 51-55, F
No one has commented on statues everywhere being pulled down or broken or vandalized. Isn't that a crime?
@melissa001 Everyone is commenting. You’re not saying anything new. What you don’t understand is that people have been asking “politely” for decades. Some of the Confederate statues were put up long after the Civil War ended, by segregationists specifically to intimidate former slaves and their descendants.
SW-User
@bijouxbroussard @melissa001 The statue of Edward Colston in Bristol has been the subject of a campaign for years and years, decades. I remember back in the 80s some musicians refusing to play Colston Hall in Bristol all as part of the campaign to have his "legacy" reevaluated. Sadly for hundreds of years we the privileged white have not responded to black concerns. We've dismissed it as "ages ago", "it's changed now", etc. etc. but it does matter to people who live their whole lives in a society that is institutionally set up to discriminate against them. If you don't do anything eventually they take things into their own hands.

Many years ago a wise man said to me - "Wherever you see violence or damage ask yourself what is the perceived injustice? You will always find one".
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
NIC0LE · F
What kind of statue is it?
@NIC0LE Usually these are statues of Confederate traitors who rebelled against the government because they wanted to be able to keep owning other people and working them to death. The statues were erected by the descendants of these traitors to intimidate the descendants of enslaved people who at the time were still not able to enjoy equal rights as citizens.
Because the prevailing authorities approve of it.
I agree with you !
Depends whether or not you dislike black people and [b]don’t[/b] think their lives matter. Generally one has to get a permit to paint any type of slogan or mural on any property that isn’t theirs, or consent from city or state leaders. The type of person who would just paint over BLM (assuming it’s not on their property) would be a white supremacist, trying to make a point.

 
Post Comment