Replacing Darwin [Spirituality & Religion]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjZZXxaEhpY]
This is an awesome book and video.
This is an awesome book and video.
61-69, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
View 58 more replies »
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@LordShadowfire Only because you can't understand English. Let me guess you are a college graduate too.
@hippyjoe1955 Allow me to fix that run-on sentence for you:
[quote]Let me guess. You are a college graduate, too.[/quote]
[quote]Let me guess. You are a college graduate, too.[/quote]
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@LordShadowfire The fact that you completely failed to understand simple English but want to try to be a grammar nazi.... Too Funny. Run along son you don't have a clue.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 I'll be honest, I didn't watch any of it. You will notice, however, that I have made no criticism of the video or the book it promotes.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Bushranger [quote] I'll be honest, I didn't watch any of it.[/quote]
I'm sorry you didn't, Bushranger, you might've learned something.
I'm sorry you didn't, Bushranger, you might've learned something.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 What? How to quote mine, misinterpret science or misrepresent the theory of evolution?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Replacing Darwin? What does he think every biologist in the world is hoping to do, trying to do, and dreaming of doing?
Nobel Prizes and academic honours await, not to mention the sheer satisfaction of having advanced human understanding by offering a better Theory.
Because that’s the [i]only[/i] thing that can replace the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.
A better Theory.
Do you have one?
Because this guy doesn’t.
Nobel Prizes and academic honours await, not to mention the sheer satisfaction of having advanced human understanding by offering a better Theory.
Because that’s the [i]only[/i] thing that can replace the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.
A better Theory.
Do you have one?
Because this guy doesn’t.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 your god can be dismissed out of hand. There’s no compelling necessity to even postulate its existence.
If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, feel free to go right ahead.
If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, feel free to go right ahead.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]your god can be dismissed out of hand.[/quote]
You tend to dismiss what you don't understand, Newjaninev, or don't want to understand, science included.
You tend to dismiss what you don't understand, Newjaninev, or don't want to understand, science included.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 your god can be dismissed out of hand. There’s [b]no compelling necessity[/b] to even postulate its existence.
Again... If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, [b]feel free to go right ahead.[/b]
Again... If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, [b]feel free to go right ahead.[/b]
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 it depends on which chapter you read in Genesis...now...what.
SW-User
@newjaninev2 I guess he needed to learn about genetics Some way...
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 he needed a rib to perform a miracle?
When presumably he knew the dna structure already...
...and could have created them concurrently.
...god liked the penis idea ...so it came first..
When presumably he knew the dna structure already...
...and could have created them concurrently.
...god liked the penis idea ...so it came first..
@canusernamebemyusername No need. Title says it all.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
🤣
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Bushranger [quote]Nah, just pointing out that you are nothing but a lying little troll.[/quote]
Why must you keep accusing me the same thing that you're doing, Bushranger, you lying little troll?
Why must you keep accusing me the same thing that you're doing, Bushranger, you lying little troll?
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 Your posts and replies prove @Bushranger correct.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@CopperCicada The funniest of all is Jeanson's misuse of coalescence calculations by using calculations that have nothing to do with coalescent theory. He’s either completely incompetent, or deliberately and wilfully deceitful.
What a surprise!
What a surprise!
SW-User
@CopperCicada he walks around so much very important information to derive his ideas.
No credible researcher starts with a predetermined end
No credible researcher starts with a predetermined end