Replacing Darwin [Spirituality & Religion]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjZZXxaEhpY]
This is an awesome book and video.
This is an awesome book and video.
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Replacing Darwin? What does he think every biologist in the world is hoping to do, trying to do, and dreaming of doing?
Nobel Prizes and academic honours await, not to mention the sheer satisfaction of having advanced human understanding by offering a better Theory.
Because that’s the [i]only[/i] thing that can replace the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.
A better Theory.
Do you have one?
Because this guy doesn’t.
Nobel Prizes and academic honours await, not to mention the sheer satisfaction of having advanced human understanding by offering a better Theory.
Because that’s the [i]only[/i] thing that can replace the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.
A better Theory.
Do you have one?
Because this guy doesn’t.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Replacing Darwin? What does he think every biologist in the world is hoping to do, trying to do, and dreaming of doing?[/quote]
So why haven't they done it?
So why haven't they done it?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Because they cannot. [/quote]
Your scientists may not, Newjaninev, but our scientists can replace Darwin.
Science 101
Your scientists may not, Newjaninev, but our scientists can replace Darwin.
Science 101
SW-User
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Your 'scientists' (as I’ve just pointed out to you) are not scientists.
They are sophists, weavers of fables
You seem unaware of how science works.
Would you like a lesson?
Then again, I doubt it would help your understanding.
They are sophists, weavers of fables
You seem unaware of how science works.
Would you like a lesson?
Then again, I doubt it would help your understanding.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 That illustration only portrays your ignorance, Newjaninev, not your intelligence.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Ignorance of what, [b]exactly[/b]?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 your god can be dismissed out of hand. There’s no compelling necessity to even postulate its existence.
If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, feel free to go right ahead.
If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, feel free to go right ahead.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]your god can be dismissed out of hand.[/quote]
You tend to dismiss what you don't understand, Newjaninev, or don't want to understand, science included.
You tend to dismiss what you don't understand, Newjaninev, or don't want to understand, science included.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 your god can be dismissed out of hand. There’s [b]no compelling necessity[/b] to even postulate its existence.
Again... If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, [b]feel free to go right ahead.[/b]
Again... If you want to put my understanding of the scientific enterprise to the test, [b]feel free to go right ahead.[/b]