Do you believe Dr Ford's ex boyfriend?

Is this is the letter, where the ex boyfriend, says, multiple times, that he could not remember exactly what years they lived together, or the years she lived in Hawaii, while in a long-term relationship with him. He does seem to remember when she cheated on him when she lived in Hawaii.

Here's the thing:

1. Fear or flying, does not mean you don't fly. Up to 25% of Americans have some sort of fear of flying, nervousness, anxiety, etc., but only a tiny percentage will simply not fly.

2. If you live in the Bay Area, and even if you are uncomfortable in small spaces, a 500 sq ft apartment, may be all you can afford, and if it has doors and windows, even if it's a single door, is something you can get used to.

I would not be surprised, given her speciality, and schooling, that she would be familiar with polygraphs, or that she may have counseled someone, on how to relax, the same way a therapist may counsel someone on how to relax, prior to a key job interview. In my previous job, I used to have regular sessions, with specialists, to improve my nerves, when dealing with industry panels.

Learning how to relax, is not a method to pass a polygraph test. BTW, the person in question, has been identified, and she is a retired FBI agent. She gave statements today, vehemently denying that Professor Ford coached her on how to lie on a polygraph.

Nevertheless, as far as I'm concerned, it's never been about whether or not he attacked her, it's about his fitness to sit on the highest court of the land, especially given his less than stellar performance, during the hearings.

I think the correct charge in this case is lying to congress.

I think this should be used as proof of perjury and we should make an example of her. Charge her with it and kavanaugh sue her for defamation of character

I don't think she'll be charged, and I also think Jeff Flake has a really big decision to make.

The concensus appears to be that we believe all the women (if they are Democrats) and disbelieve all the men if they do not support the allegations of the Democrat Party women. I choose not to believe anyone whose allegations are not supported by facts, and I haven't seen any facts yet. Waiting for the FBI report with bated breath.

Once provided with facts, we can move on to the question of who might be charged with perjury.

Of course not. The letter hasn't been vetted or verified. The two "scathing" assertions are that she once helped ease the nerves of a friend preparing to take a polygraph by ­“explaining in detail what to ­expect” and how they work - something almost anyone could do - and that she never mentioned a sexual assault to him. What of it?

[b][b]HERE IS THE THING[/b][/b]

As time has gone on, Dr Ford’s testimony has grown warts. It’s been picked apart, friends have bailed on her, she had been contradicted and all have realized that the Dems led by Mrs Feinstein abused Dr Ford’s Trust. As Dr Ford started, she wanted this information to possibly hav Kavanaugh withdraw behind closed doors after Feinstein circulated the letter. Mrs FeInstein however didn’t do what Dr Ford wished and instead released the letter when all the other testimony was in and forced Dr Ford to testify (exactly what Dr Ford stated she did not want to do).

A lot of time and money has been wasted and the republicans have been motivated for the midterms as a result of thr farce Kavanaugh was a spoiled preppie, obnoxious frat boy who grew up and has had an unblemished record since he began working both professionally and personally. I’m not thrilled about his deportment in defending himself. But ......

Nope. This is a huge mess. I’m in favor of starting over with a new nominee.

What may be a bigger issue is the likelihood of a defamation lawsuit against Dr. Ford and her handlers. I don't think there are enough zeroes to measure the damages, and punitive damages.

I always knew she was a lying whore

Good point, he dated Ford for 6 years and said he once saw Ford help ease the nerves of a friend preparing to take a polygraph by ­“explaining in detail what to ­expect” and how they work.

That conflicts with her answer of "Never" when asked d if she had ever talked with anyone other than her lawyers about how to take a polygraph.

Nothing provided indicates perjury so I doubt it.

Yes I do and she should be charged with perjury and publically whipped for trying to destroy a great man.

She will not be charged with perjury. I think a memory issue and it would be impossible to prove that she lied even if she "misremembered"

All accusers now discredited and shown to have lied under oath.