Top | Newest First | Oldest First
20 hour weeks are better
View 2 more replies »
eyeno · M
@eyeno it's the best
eyeno · M
@mysteryespresso hehe...,dont worry your day will come...,
https://similarworlds.com/music/4259223-This-old-heart-of-mine-Thought-the-day-would-never
https://similarworlds.com/music/4259223-This-old-heart-of-mine-Thought-the-day-would-never
scorpiolovedeep · 51-55, M
We average 55/65 hours per week in Construction.
If we were to do 40 hours per week , you will have the roads and buildings built in double the projected duration.
I will give another example :
Night shift productivity will reduce by approx 60% if you want a 40 hour week
If we were to do 40 hours per week , you will have the roads and buildings built in double the projected duration.
I will give another example :
Night shift productivity will reduce by approx 60% if you want a 40 hour week
MethDozer · M
@scorpiolovedeep uh-huh.
scorpiolovedeep · 51-55, M
In saying that 40 hours a week could mean less salary / wages , how would one cope up with rising costs ?
@MethDozer
@MethDozer
MethDozer · M
@scorpiolovedeep Paying to people for thirty hours is the same as paying one person sixty hours.
NoahB · 31-35, M
seriously, this 40 hour work week is just stupid. like damn all I do is work
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Eternity · 26-30, M
Naw. That would only benefit the working class. Fuck those guys.
Alisha233 · 31-35, F
Mmmm you got my vote.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
That could happen
pancakeslam · 41-45, M
and pay double
This message was deleted by its author.