Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

National Weather Service is rehiring following DOGE cuts

The National Weather Service is reversing course and is now in the process of hiring back hundreds of its workers following massive cuts and a federal hiring freeze.

The NWS will hire 450 meteorologists, hydrologists and radar technicians.

An official with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the rehires will include 126 new positions that were previously approved and funded.

Those jobs are labeled as “front-line mission critical” to the agency.

Staff reductions were first carried out earlier this year by the Department of Government Efficiency.

More than 500 weather employees were let go or forced into retirement by the Trump administration.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Does that mean the "sharpie" prediction technique isn't reliable enough???


Trump (falsely) tweeted on Sept. 1, 2019, that several southern states, including Alabama, were “most likely to be hit” by the hurricane after its deadly pass through the Bahamas. Three days later, Trump shared a fake map in which a storm track, seemingly drawn with a black Sharpie, showed Hurricane Dorian moving toward Alabama. When a National Weather Service forecaster tried to set the record straight, its parent agency, NOAA, released an unsigned statement disavowing the correction — seemingly to appease the White House.

Trump’s fake map and the administration’s insistence on defending it despite evidence to the contrary — dubbed #SharpieGate on Twitter — shows how the administration has prioritized politics over science, even during a fast-moving, life-threatening situation.

Officials and scientists, both inside and outside the government, were horrified, the newly released emails show.

“For an agency founded upon and recognized for determining scientific truths, trusted by the public, and responsible in law to put forward important science information, I find it unconscionable that an anonymous voice inside of NOAA would be found to castigate a dutiful, correct, and loyal NWS Forecaster who spoke the truth,” Craig McLean, then the agency’s assistant administrator, wrote in a Sept. 7 email to other top-level government officials.

“What concerns me most is that this Administration is eroding the public trust in NOAA for an apparent political recovery from an ill timed and imprecise comment from the President.”