Apparently, the paid protestors are still going strong.

Someone on EP made a post this morning about a job interview. When I asked about it, he said that it was for a company called Grassroots Campaigns. You might have heard of them if you followed the "fake news" about protesters being paid to protest president-elect Trump.

I've got to say, I've never seen a company so awful and shamelessly un-American. The way they do business is by paying people minimum wage to protest for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, MoveOn, the Democratic National Committee, and other organizations. Many of these clients are funded by George Soros, the notorious terrorism funding, cop killing, globalist hedge fund manager. Those organizations pay this for-profit company to have these fake crowds bunch up, turning their fat wallets into what appears to be a grassroots protest of something.

The irony is incredible, as a mob of paid protesters is anything but grassroots! That won't stop naive and desperate people (read: college-aged or uneducated people) from working for them, though. This truly is a sad state of affairs for our political system.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Grassroots_Campaigns,_Inc.

There's a link to their wikipedia page. You can read for yourself how the Soros controlled super-PAC MoveOn funded their creation in 40+ cities in 2004.

How this nonsense is tolerated is beyond me.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

Nonsense tolerated... 🤔

Would you ban protest and funding for groups you disagree with?

Invisible · 26-30, M

These are not protests. These are groups of people who need money opting to be either witting or unwitting pawns of Soros.

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

If you want money out of politics, fine, but that has to be the same for all sides.

Invisible · 26-30, M

@Burnley123: I can't argue with you if you refuse to listen. Money in politics is unavoidable, but when money is used in an immoral way it is entirely different. If you're going to continue talking about a separate topic, do it on your own post.

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

Question dodge. ;-)

Invisible · 26-30, M

I didn't answer because it's the wrong question. You either don't understand what I'm talking about or are a fool for arguing in favor of scum like Soros.

I would never ban any protesting, but it becomes an entirely different matter when you force people who are otherwise unemployed to protest for your cause. That is where I draw the line.

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

when you force people who are otherwise unemployed to protest for your cause.

Can you link me evidence for that?

Invisible · 26-30, M

Force is a strong word, but for those who can't get jobs, it's either find something like this or don't have any income. If you can't understand why that's a morally wrong way to turn campaign dollars into news articles, then I'm done talking to you.