This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultPositive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

9th Circuit Dissent Gets it but Doesn't...

In a fiery dissent, Judge Jay Bybee said the decision failed to correctly apply the Bruen test, and that using the logic of the decision, any firearms regulation could be interpreted as a violation of the Second Amendment.

“It is difficult to imagine a regulation on the acquisition of ammunition or firearms that would not ‘meaningfully constrain’ the right to keep and bear arms under the majority’s new general applicability standard,” Bybee wrote in the dissent.

re: Cali ammo background checks.

 
Post Comment