Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Eighty Years On - Will We Ever Learn?

Eighty years since the first atomic bomb used in anger was exploded about 800 metres above Hiroshima.

Around 140 000 people were killed by the blast, heat and ionising radiation; many others were appallingly badly injured, or developed cancers later from the radiation.

A few days later a second was detonated above Nagasaki.

They did end the Second World War, which in Asia revolved around Japan's imperialist ambitions: she had invaded China in the 1930s, among other countries.

However, it was at terrible civilian cost because like an earlier, massive USAAF bombing raid on Tokyo using conventional weapons, these were deliberately dropped on civilian cities.

Not military targets, as the US government tried deceitfully to claim at the time, while the US President callously claimed it as saving "thousands of young American lives" (US Services' volunteers and conscripts.)


We can all hope the Nagasaki one was the second and last ever to be used.


Those two bombs were designed by a UK/USA consortium of physicists and engineers, not only Americans, but the decision to use them was taken by the Americans alone without consulting their allies.

They had intended yields of 20kilotonnes TNT equivalent. The Hiroshima one seems not to "used" all its enriched uranium, so the actual blast was nearer 16kt. (The rest of the uranium would have been evaporated in the explosion, and condensed among the fallout.)


The result?

Ending the War in Europe had included stopping the Nazis developing the atomic bomb; but since then the Soviet bloc and NATO countries built terrifying arsenals of uranium-fission bombs far more powerful than those two dropped on Japan; and the vastly more powerful hydrogen-fusion bomb of tens of Megatonne TNT equivalents.

The USA placed many of its nuclear bombs, both aircraft-delivered and on ballistic missiles, in Britain. Although that locating would have needed British agreement, we now know the USA would not have sought agreement or prior knowledge to launch them. Essentially the USA saw her allies' territories as sacrificial launch-pads, but was very well aware her own territory would have been a Soviet target too.


Those arsenals and associated war installations have been reduced by post-Soviet treaties, but the Russian Federation and the United States of America, and to a lesser extent the UK (and other NATO countries?) still have them; and we now see unpredictable regimes like North Korea and Iran building them in an increasingly precarious world.

....

Today Hiroshima is marking the anniversary with a memorial event in its "Peace Park" gardens established below the detonation point when the city was rebuilt.

The whole world must note, learn and never forget.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Never forget. Yet this wasn't the cause of civilians being targeted in that war.

A interesting Japanese documentary on NHK refers to why that bomb was used. The Japanese were using their own civilians, especially women, in the actual war. This lead to the use of such terrible forces.

Picture the Gaza situation with women and children combatants. That's how fanatical the Japanese were.

Neither situation was justifiable.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer A good analogy.

Unfortunately the era of wars being fought by military units squaring up to each other are long past, and civilians are now seen as targets as well as the army or navy; or at least civilian losses are simply described by that awful jargon "co-lateral damage".

The Japaense forces certainly were fanatics, spurred on by a twisted code of honour in which surrendering is totally wrong. Though the fighting in Palestine is even more one-sided because Hamas is an organised group but still all civilians among civilians.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@ArishMell By no means do I suggest either was right. Yet that war was a significant reason why civilians have been used ever since.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer Civilians were already becoming victims in World War One, though perhaps not as cynically and deliberately as they are now.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@ArishMell listen. My great grandfather insisted that my grandfather move to the USA along with the other siblings to other countries just before WWI.

Yet asked them all to return to Czechoslovakia in the 1920s. WWII caught him by surprise though.

He got shot and my father was sent to prison camp as a political prisoner. My grandfather had already died of a blood clot. None of my family were in any form of military during either WWI or WWII. Politics was a different story. Politics got great grandfather shot.