This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Magicianzini · M
Why.. it's not any worse than all the people who constantly walk past him.
This must also be the same robot who got beaten up and sexually assaulted. Maybe it's scared now to stop.
This must also be the same robot who got beaten up and sexually assaulted. Maybe it's scared now to stop.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Magicianzini · M
@val70 It's impossible for a program to beat anyone at all, never mind to death. Programs are more apt to drive one insane.
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini Exactly. The death of sanity
Magicianzini · M
@val70 It was slang 🤯
Why was the robot so much worse for you .. than the people who pass by that man daily..
Why was the robot so much worse for you .. than the people who pass by that man daily..
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini Because I still have a mind. The robot represents a company, an authority, in short something much more than just the one individual. One needs to put responsibility back on the menu. A simular thing is happening to the Epstein scandal. Look at the pictures with the abused girls unredacted and a sain person gets a feeling of guilt. It's tollerating the institutionalisation of excesses that's wrong. The actual guy owing Victoria Secrets funded Epstein. Not that owning a lingerie brand is wrong, it's all about the money. No financial journalist was told to contact Epstein for an interview about investment
Magicianzini · M
@val70 A company is an inanimate object. It doesn't even really exist. Each time a person walks past that man, that's the real issue.
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini Oh come on, you're either not paying this the necessary attention or just don't want to. When something gets to become accepted beyond the individual act then it's up for acceptance in the society at large. Lie once as an individual, well, that's that. Lie as a goverment or even a Californian water company and there are indeed much greater consequences
Magicianzini · M
@val70 It's crazy to me that you view it backwards.. but still, that's your choice to make. To me, it's much more serious when done by a human .. than an inanimate object. I wouldn't expect an object to have compassion or a conscious, like I would a human.
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini What is the act of taking a picture of a rape then?
Magicianzini · M
@val70 The same as those who walk past that man. There's no difference. It's a lack of kindness and conscious.
But you do point out to me the selfishness of it all. I still think all of man's issues are rooted in cruelty though.
But you do point out to me the selfishness of it all. I still think all of man's issues are rooted in cruelty though.
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini You clearly don't understand the difference
Magicianzini · M
@val70 True, you don't. Since you've decided to get personal here. All I can do is agree with you. I don't think you understand much at all. Who would think an object has a conscience.. yet a human shouldn't. It's unfathomable to me.
But better even is just agreeing to disagree.
You think an object has a higher accountability than a person. I do not. We will not see eye to eye, so the logical conclusion is just agreeing to disagree.
But better even is just agreeing to disagree.
You think an object has a higher accountability than a person. I do not. We will not see eye to eye, so the logical conclusion is just agreeing to disagree.
val70 · 56-60
@Magicianzini It's my experience that the person who keeps chewing gum at the diner table isn't especially curteous. How about that? See the difference between an individual act and a act in a group's setting? Again, it's much more than just individulism and individual morals
Magicianzini · M
@val70 I'm sorry. Maybe there's a language barrier, I realize. I have no idea how or why you would think chewing gum is a cruel act or how it compares. If you're trying to somehow compare it to a morally-criminal act like people passing by the homeless man then ok .. but then it still doesn't make sense. A company is not a group of people. It's a greed machine. Are you thinking of each individual IN a company perhaps? I still do not view that as the same since we all know who controls the companies. You cannot expect psychopaths to not be cruel. They also cause any applicable underlings to be cruel in a way, though it's always a choice by each individual. It's their own greed that causes them to submit. All of that is to only be expected. But for ONE person to walk by a homeless man.. each at a time? That is our real problem.
Do you know why that's our real problem? Because if we each weren't like this, and had kindness and compassion, we wouldn't even BEGIN to tolerate the whole psychopaths & companies thing.
Yet we do. We do because we also walk by that one homeless man. It's all one in the same and the individual is the mass. And the mass causes to outcome... of toleration of the psychos running companies problem.
Do you know why that's our real problem? Because if we each weren't like this, and had kindness and compassion, we wouldn't even BEGIN to tolerate the whole psychopaths & companies thing.
Yet we do. We do because we also walk by that one homeless man. It's all one in the same and the individual is the mass. And the mass causes to outcome... of toleration of the psychos running companies problem.
robingoodfellow · M
@Magicianzini true, lots of people will walk past that man without a 2nd thought. But someone eventually comes along and either helps him or calls for help. The robots are never going to stop.








