What happens when you identify as a race that you aren't in a job application?

Exactly!

Rachel Dolezal lost her career. What planet do you live on?

@KaliKali: I live on the planet where was she continued her career for years after her lie was exposed and she now has a celebrated book. How about you?

Funny how you had nothing for Elizabeth Warren.

[quote] I live on the planet where was she continued her career for years after her lie was exposed and she now has a celebrated book.[/quote]

Oh. Well on Earth so was exposed in June 2015 and resigned that same month. She has been working as a hairdresser since. "Celebrated book" is a bit of stretch. xD

[quote] How about you?[/quote]

Earth, usually.

[quote]Funny how you had nothing for Elizabeth Warren.[/quote]

Why is that funny? I was just pointing out incorrect things you said. The Elizabeth Warren shit is true pretty much.

@KaliKali: Exposed and admitted to are different things. You'd think you'd understand that if you really lived on Earth.

You should really read what leftists are saying about the book. Celebrated is hardly a stretch at all.

So, in other words, you were hoping I'd stay quiet after the first reply and you wouldn't have to address Warren.

[quote]Exposed and admitted to are different things. You'd think you'd understand that if you really lived on Earth.[/quote]

Can you provide something from before 2015 about her being white? I'd like to see it.

[quote]You should really read what leftists are saying about the book. Celebrated is hardly a stretch at all.[/quote]

Everyone seems interested in the book because she is crazy.

[quote]So, in other words, you were hoping I'd stay quiet after the first reply and you wouldn't have to address Warren.[/quote]

What are you basing that on? I'm not a liberal nor an Elizabeth Warren fan. I can recognize that you are wrong about one thing and right about another at the same time, my brain hasn't been turned to mush by partisan new sources.

@KaliKali: I could, yes. But I don't waste my time trying anymore. You have access to Google if you really care, but I doubt you do. Hence the not wasting my time part.

So now you admit the book is celebrated. Interesting.

I'm basing that on the fact that you said nothing about Warren until after I called you on it and that your initial reply was nothing more than condescending, and false, tripe.

[quote] I could, yes. But I don't waste my time trying anymore. You have access to Google if you really care, but I doubt you do. Hence the not wasting my time part.[/quote]

I dare you to provide something.

[quote]So now you admit the book is celebrated. Interesting.[/quote]

Do you know what the word "celebrated" means?

[quote]I'm basing that on the fact that you said nothing about Warren until after I called you on it and that your initial reply was nothing more than condescending, and false, tripe.[/quote]

I didn't say anything about her because there was nothing to say. xD It is true that she lied about being Native American and there was very little backlash about it.

@KaliKali: I don't care what you dare. You wouldn't even click the link, just like all the other leftists that demand sources on SW and then ignore them.

Would you pick a narrative and stick to it?

Then why are you wasting time with a pointless argument? I don't buy it. You wanted an argument, but wanted to avoid Warren. Considering your attitude, that's the only thing that makes sense.

[quote] I don't care what you dare. You wouldn't even click the link, just like all the other leftists that demand sources on SW and then ignore them.
[/quote]

Sure. 🙄 We both know why you won't provide a source.

[quote]Would you pick a narrative and stick to it?[/quote]

Rachel Dolezal's book is not celebrated, the only significant interest in it stems from her being crazy. Please show me where I suggested anything else.

[quote]Then why are you wasting time with a pointless argument? I don't buy it. You wanted an argument, but wanted to avoid Warren. Considering your attitude, that's the only thing that makes sense.
[/quote]

I was just pointing out that you were lying about Rachel Dolezal. You can lie about one thing and not about another. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

@KaliKali: Well, obviously I won't. I've only said exactly that twice. Thanks for catching up.

You dismissed her book. Try being honest.

You should really be more honest if you're going to call others lairs. But thanks for acknowledging you just wanted a pointless argument.