Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Canada voted though the emergencies act

Its becoming clearer and clearer that the last 2 years was never about good health.

Insane lockdowns, experimental injections, isolation, destruction of the economy (for the 99%), masks, huge reduction in health care services, mandates (slavery) and now a sprinkling of martial law and economic warfare (seizing citizens bank accounts)

Stop defending this murderous, insane system and its acolytes
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
There was no reduction in health care. A better cause here forward is ask the government to re-invest in healthcare. Our response was based in lack of beds. If it makes you angry, be angry - but that is the culprit and there was no changing that in two years. Where there was more beds, notably, more died.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User there was a massive reduction in health care in the uk. Whole wards closed, gps refusing to see anyone etc.

And you think youre going to get extra beds from a gov that just declared war on its own population? Thats some fanciful thinking right there
SW-User
@gol979 If you are from the UK, why take your positions on Canada? How do you know? What do beds do when you have an overwhelmed healthcare system with nurses quitting? I'll speak what I saw, you speak your anger. It needs an outlet.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User youre projecting. Didnt you react with an angry face emoji in response to this post?

In relation to health care in canada (i presume your canadian) did they shut down any services, make them virtual etc because of covid?
SW-User
@gol979 Yes, cause there was not SPACE. And so what if I did respond with an angry emoji (oh no). It was the projection of knowing why Canada responded the way it did that made me annoyed. Doesn't make it I support the use of the Emergency Act but if you see my other response, worse has happened in Canada and why I am calling this political theatre.

One edit cause I'm done - the right of protest was never trumped. They had weeks of protesting. They interpreted the meaning of being able to protest, change government (literally), and lesser government position, cause the real purpose was political change they could occupy forever. Protesting is a privilege given in a democracy, such as occupying a street, bridge ... At some point it's revoked.
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User so they shut down parts of the health service so there was a reduction

Ill leave you to it. Cant be arsed with these zero context convos anymore
SW-User
@gol979 There was no beds or nurses. 100% CONTEXT. I'm not the fool from the UK talking about Canada. Spin it however you want, focus on your OWN country (which has lifted all restrictions)
gol979 · 41-45, M
@SW-User "there was no reduction in health care" to "yeah, some was shut and there was no beds or nurses"

Okayyyyy
SW-User
@gol979 so you would make them magically available? the number of available healthcare PEOPLE were available.
SW-User
@gol979 Look up the definition of constraint.
Really · 80-89, M
@gol979
Ill leave you to it.
Promises, promises..