What was up with the so-called, "Kenosha shooter" e.g. primary objective?

@ChipmunkErnie I don't know enough of the facts, so far, it fairly reeks of lies and deception. Someone said of one guy who was shot that he has a criminal record of being a pedophile, he knew this in advance? How? I'm going to have to watch the entire thing if I can stomach it.

@Grateful4you [quote][b] There is no evidence so far that the backgrounds of the three victims — Anthony Huber, Joseph Rosenbaum and Gaige Grosskreutz — had anything to do with the clashes that led to the deaths of Huber and Rosenbaum and the wounding of Grosskreutz.

They are the victims of a shooting, and as far as we can tell their past legal records have no bearing on them being shot during a protest.

If more facts emerge that show their backgrounds are relevant to what happened that night in Kenosha, we would revisit our decision. For instance, if there is evidence that any of the victims’ backgrounds could have affected their interactions with Rittenhouse, or if he knew anything about them before the shooting.[/b][/quote]

@bijouxbroussard The jury has already made a decision? I'm totally baffled frankly.

@Grateful4you No, the choosing of the jury was commented on by the judge before the trial even started. Because of the local laws there the prosecution was basically able to keep minorities from sitting on the jury.

@ChipmunkErnie Sounds straight out of, "To Kill A Mockingbird" a kangaroo court. I guess the 50's wants their court system back. Does the judge wear a clean white robe as well?

@Grateful4you The judge is the one who publicly stated it was racist but be couldn't do anything about it because of the way the law was written.

@ChipmunkErnie Jeebus Christ on a cracker! This get's worse the longer I read this. I saw a few minutes of this kid "Crying" and thought it so totally over -acted it was like watching theatre of the absurd done very poorly. This is a legal travesty.