What was up with the so-called, "Kenosha shooter" e.g. primary objective?

I've only seen brief courtroom interactions. Seems that judge is on the side of the defendant.

bijouxbroussard · F Best Comment

Sounds like the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting. He took a gun, drove to a BLM protest and ended up shooting two unarmed participants. He shouldn’t have gone there in the first place.

View 4 more replies »

Grateful4you · M

@ChipmunkErnie He would have been tazed to death before it ever found it's way into a courtroom.

bijouxbroussard · F

@ChipmunkErnie That’s [b]precisely[/b] what I thought about. A black kid bringing an automatic weapon to a “Unite The Right” march, for example. The police certainly wouldn’t have been chatting and joking with him the way they were observed with [b]Rittenhouse[/b]. He wouldn’t have gotten the [b]chance[/b] to shoot anyone because the [b]police[/b] would’ve killed him.

kentex35 · 100+, M

@ChipmunkErnie I wish that wasn't true.

ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M

Haven't been watching closely, but I did hear that the judge actually called the jury selection process racist, but because the way the law was written he couldn't do anything about it. If I remember right, the area is 60%+ non-white, but the jury is 11 white and 1 black because of the challenges of the defense.

View 5 more replies »

ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M

@Grateful4you The judge is the one who publicly stated it was racist but be couldn't do anything about it because of the way the law was written.

This message was deleted by its author.

Grateful4you · M

@ChipmunkErnie Jeebus Christ on a cracker! This get's worse the longer I read this. I saw a few minutes of this kid "Crying" and thought it so totally over -acted it was like watching theatre of the absurd done very poorly. This is a legal travesty.