This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Yes, once tested sufficiently to be as both safe and effective as reasonably possible.
You might argue as a point of logic that true efficacy is something of a "can't prove a negative" conundrum for some years, perhaps a couple of decades or so, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.
I already have an annual influenza jab; I have been inoculated against polio, tetanus and tuberculosis; I have no time for the anti-vaccination types who want those horrible diseases returning to being as common as they once were.
You might argue as a point of logic that true efficacy is something of a "can't prove a negative" conundrum for some years, perhaps a couple of decades or so, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.
I already have an annual influenza jab; I have been inoculated against polio, tetanus and tuberculosis; I have no time for the anti-vaccination types who want those horrible diseases returning to being as common as they once were.