This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
pknein · 46-50, M
you presume we arent already living in a matrix
TinyViolins · 31-35, M
@pknein I also presume that we're not all puppets controlled by ghosts. This isn't an epistemological debate, but a question about preference
pknein · 46-50, M
@TinyViolins eh.. why stipulate that we'd have to know? if that is the sticking point, and the technology was truly sufficiently advanced that it was veridical, then they would just remove the knowing from the equation...
TinyViolins · 31-35, M
@pknein Because it's a matter of choice. Would you take the blue pill or the red pill? If something is all you've ever known, there's not much of an incentive to change it.
pknein · 46-50, M
alright but what do you think the question, as you posed it (with the stipulation about knowing) actually gets to answering? What do you think the question reveals if someone says yes or no?
TinyViolins · 31-35, M
@pknein It can reveal a lot of things. Different people are motivated by different things. It's not meant to be a Rorschach test, but a matter of what people prefer between two alternatives.