This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TheOrionbeltseeker · 36-40, M
You have problem if the Government wants to control. You have problem when the Govt does not take any steps to control. You are just problematic.
People want to secure their life to avoid unnecessary expenses of taking the virus out if they get it. You seem like a rich guy who throws cash down the road when you walk. Sadly, everyone is not like you. You should eat bat soup and eat Pangolin too. They might taste good right now for you.
People want to secure their life to avoid unnecessary expenses of taking the virus out if they get it. You seem like a rich guy who throws cash down the road when you walk. Sadly, everyone is not like you. You should eat bat soup and eat Pangolin too. They might taste good right now for you.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@TheOrionbeltseeker You watch to much television
DownTheStreet · 51-55, M
@TheOrionbeltseeker all those assumptions
TheOrionbeltseeker · 36-40, M
@sunsporter1649 you sound like those Chinese people who took the number to 80000, before that, they were roaming in Europe seeing Pisa tower and doing fun in Spain.
TheOrionbeltseeker · 36-40, M
@DownTheStreet why you want to put someone else's life on risk because of your little adventures?
The kids may catch it from you. Maybe it does nothing to you but it can be harmful to younger ones and toddlers.
The kids may catch it from you. Maybe it does nothing to you but it can be harmful to younger ones and toddlers.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@TheOrionbeltseeker Sounds just like the goddamndemocrats, eh?
The “No Ban Act,” introduced by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) and co-sponsored by 219 House Democrats, would have prevented Trump from immediately implementing a travel ban on China once the outbreak of the coronavirus spread past its origins of Wuhan.
Instead, the No Ban Act would have allowed travelers from Wuhan to continue to arrive in the U.S. while the president received guidance from Congress.
“This bill imposes limitations on the President’s authority to suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States and terminates certain presidential actions implementing such restrictions,” a summary of the legislation reads.
The “No Ban Act,” introduced by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) and co-sponsored by 219 House Democrats, would have prevented Trump from immediately implementing a travel ban on China once the outbreak of the coronavirus spread past its origins of Wuhan.
Instead, the No Ban Act would have allowed travelers from Wuhan to continue to arrive in the U.S. while the president received guidance from Congress.
“This bill imposes limitations on the President’s authority to suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States and terminates certain presidential actions implementing such restrictions,” a summary of the legislation reads.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@TheOrionbeltseeker miss nancy covered that loophole by including funding for planned parenthood in the China Virus bill. She is an equal opportunity killer