This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
EugenieLaBorgia · F
Were it to happen in the next hundred years, it would be absolute chaos! Quite simply, very few women have either the capability or ability to rule.
KA9ha · 31-35, M
@EugenieLaBorgia incorrect a statement .. women have the capability but don't want the responsibility .
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@KA9ha Capability and ability are entirely different. You only mentioned capability. So, the next time you have the audacity to claim a statement is 'incorrect', consult a dictionary - preferably within the next 100 years. Thanks, though, for your input.
Nimbus · M
KingKripple · 70-79, M
@EugenieLaBorgia I don't know about that. We've had a Queen since three years before I was born.
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@KingKripple If you are referring to Her Majesty, Elizabeth, then please remember that I wrote 'very few women have.....' Her Majesty is a remarkable woman and excellent queen!
KA9ha · 31-35, M
@EugenieLaBorgia Nnnooooo Cleopatra ruled amicably centuries ago and that in a land of crude and rough pharaoh's . Same in Norway,land of Vikings
EugenieLaBorgia · F
@KA9ha As I have already stated: 'very few women have either the capability or ability to rule.'
KA9ha · 31-35, M
@EugenieLaBorgia correct... and since you happen to be a select princess ,,,naturally you would know
KA9ha · 31-35, M
@EugenieLaBorgia i can see the true YYOU ::::
[image/video - please log in to see this content]