Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are you a former Trump critic who is now beginning to see the President in a new light?

For the last two years I ate a steady diet of Hate-Trump propaganda on CNN. I am beginning to wonder if it was all just media crap designed to whip up the country into a liberal hysteria. Seriously, I am beginning to wonder. Are you wondering too? Isn't it possible the liberal electorate have been duped by the liberal power elite who use the media as a propaganda tool for mind control purposes?

@MarineBob
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FrostBorne · 31-35, M
I wasn't a critic, but I'd like to point out that CNN continually ran with the story of the Russian collusion. Mulluer just released his report of the investigation and reported that there was no collusion between the President and Russia. If the Liberals can run with that story for two years without any evidence, what else are they lieing about?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@FrostBorne Are you nuts or a high official in the Justice Department? The report hasn't been released to the public and no one in the public knows what is in the report. In the meantime, 37 people have been indicted. So, keep your panties on until we know the facts. Then, if you decide to take them off, do so in private. And, that's just the way it is around here. Got it?
@FrostBorne To my knowledge...there is a chance Mueller sent that sealed envelope to congress to find out what he found on Trump? Since u cannot indite a sitting president...the truth may be revealed after he’s no longer in office?
@MarkPaul Trump wasn't indicted and neither was anybody in his family.
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays Perhaps after he steps down from office... no one really knows the total report. Who really knows? I can tell u that this great country of ours has been turned upside down! Aren’t we divided now more than ever? I’m sure Putin likes the hell out of that? Ha?
WalksWith · 56-60, F
@FrostBorne

*Mueller
*Lying

And guess what? You DON'T know what is in that report, just like the rest of us.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays The Justice Department is currently operating under the policy no president can be indicted regardless of the circumstances. So, the Baby not being indicted means little. As to the Baby-trump family members, that's true although Mueller jettisoned several of the issues to the federal district courts and state courts so there is that. With all that being said, it's doubtful any collusion was found. But, there are crimes yet to be reported. By the way, Mexico still isn't paying for the wall, North Korea hasn't removed any of its nuclear weapons, and the gutless and failing Baby-trump still leads anyone in history with lies, playing golf, and watching TV during working hours.
WalksWith · 56-60, F
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays

Nope, no FEDERAL indictments...
@WalksWith We know Trump was not indicted and nobody in his family -- Don Jr, Jared or Ivanka -- was indicted. We know that.
WalksWith · 56-60, F
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays

Never forget, Mueller found and sent evidence to New York.

Mar 22, 2019, 11:21pm
Trump Defenders Underestimate The Mueller Report By Touting No Indictments
Charles Tiefer


The pro-Trump spin machine is out on the airwaves, touting that the just-completed Mueller Report recommends no new indictments.

For ten briefly-stated reasons, the Mueller action marks more of a beginning, than an end, to the search for wrongdoing in the Russia scandal.

First, there are very active continuing investigations. When special counsels complete their reports of their principal findings, that does not end the inquiries. Instead, the tasks for prosecutors and investigators are turned over to the continuing active investigations. In this instance, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has brought prosecutions already, like Michael Cohen’s, to build on. Matters within that U.S. Attorney’s broad jurisdiction will continue forward.

Second, it is pure spin to make the issue whether new indictments are in the report. Mueller may well think that the report should give an account of his findings. New indictments are not to be expected in a report on findings. Indictments come, when ready, from the grand jury, not in reports. Rather, indictments that are moving toward readiness would come out in the other investigations, like that of the SDNY.

Third, there is particular reason to expect evidence to come out about Trump and Russia. The former National Security Adviser, Michael T. Flynn, has pled to Mueller’s charges. But nothing further of what he knows has become public before now. There is every reason to expect that whatever limited Flynn evidence is revealed via Mueller's report, there will be further evidence at the highest level as Flynn becomes a witness for more forums.

Fourth, there are a host of witnesses whose cooperation can be expected from the pressures built up from the investigations. An example is Allen Weisselberg, the corporate finance officer who carried out Trump’s instructions within the Trump Organization. In the immediate aftermath of Cohen’s testimony, it was clear than Weisselberg has not been cooperating, and that he knows an enormous amount of the wrongful things Trump ordered. The report by Mueller hardly marks an end for the pressure on Weisselberg to cooperate. That pressure will build both from prosecutors and from Congress.

more...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/?fbclid=IwAR0tHxTgzlkqnptPMuUZILlVJ68Jli8q2Ni7pXnjGIAYfitDqK0HiC0Vmew#42697427529a
@WalksWith Thank goodness for ppl as yourself! Knowing ALL the facts are key! Not somebody’s spin if it!!!??
THANK YOU!