OK. I just blocked someone (I had unblocked everyone).
His profile states that he likes incest. NOPE. NO CAN DO.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Prettybrat · 26-30, F
View 14 more replies »
SW-User
@SW-User No. They were arrested and sentenced for [b]INCEST[/b]. It is a CRIME. What don't you get? I am pretty well versed in laws regarding it since I worked for a defense attorney and I had to look at a hell of a lot of sentencing orders. A crime is a CRIME. It's the LAW. It doesn't cease to be so because you don't think it is "not the same." Not how it works.
A little reading for you:
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/incest-laws.html
Oh, and here is a actual list of charges for one the clients:
Court St. Joseph Superior Court 1
Case Type F4 - Felony 4
Filed 06/29/2018
Status 11/14/2018, Decided
Charges 35-42-4-9(a)/F4:Sexual Misconduct with a Minor Def. has intercourse with or engages in other sexual, 35-46-1-3/F4: Incest , but victim is less than 16 years old., 35-46-1-3/F5: Incest
A little reading for you:
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/incest-laws.html
Oh, and here is a actual list of charges for one the clients:
Court St. Joseph Superior Court 1
Case Type F4 - Felony 4
Filed 06/29/2018
Status 11/14/2018, Decided
Charges 35-42-4-9(a)/F4:Sexual Misconduct with a Minor Def. has intercourse with or engages in other sexual, 35-46-1-3/F4: Incest , but victim is less than 16 years old., 35-46-1-3/F5: Incest
SW-User
@SW-User #1 - You were what? A receptionist?
#2 - link me to a credible source. I’m all up for learning about something that hasn’t been thrown in my direction.
Wikipedia isn’t a credible source. Now, I’ve had a long day. I’m going to bed. You learn the levels of worrying priority.
Link me something credible, I’ll read through it tomorrow.
#2 - link me to a credible source. I’m all up for learning about something that hasn’t been thrown in my direction.
Wikipedia isn’t a credible source. Now, I’ve had a long day. I’m going to bed. You learn the levels of worrying priority.
Link me something credible, I’ll read through it tomorrow.
SW-User
@SW-User Reread the post. You truly are ignorant. Keep on believing what you want.
BTW, I was a legal assistant. I filed loads of pleadings and other court documents. But, no. I was only a "receptionist." What the fuck do you know about what I did at my job?
BTW, I was a legal assistant. I filed loads of pleadings and other court documents. But, no. I was only a "receptionist." What the fuck do you know about what I did at my job?
SW-User
@ThatDLguy 😂
ThatDLguy · 36-40
@SW-User [c=#003BB2]read my about me section and you’ll understand but id rather be straight with wveryone then regret a relation for nit saying something[/c]
SW-User
@ThatDLguy Fair enough.
Fungirlmmm · 51-55, F
SW-User
@Fungirlmmm Creepy as hell.
bijouxbroussard · F
Yeah, I’d have to keep the “pervs” blocked, too. Most of the folks I’ve blocked were in your face racists and hardcore Trump supporters (often the same people). But if Trump ends up arrested or impeached I might unblock some of them. Not to gloat, seriously, but just to see how they handled it. Would they admit that maybe they’d “backed the wrong horse” or would they think it was some great “liberal conspiracy” and see Trump as a kind of martyr ? 🤔
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@bijouxbroussard It would be confirmation (to them) of a vast 'deep state' conspiracy. I can't imagine any of them being able to have to admit they were the willing victims of a con.
SW-User
@RodionRomanovitch Never. Would never happen. Their egos cannot allow it.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@SW-User I easiest approach is to ignore them, and that idea has certainly crossed my mind often. Unfortunately, not pushing back only emboldens them further. The same is true for the science nihilists and climate change deniers. They are either so indoctrinated in hate that they can't see the proverbial forest for the trees, or they are just so ignorant of the way science accumulates evidence, that they will never have the intelligence to understand
