anyone else hate how the internet portrays people?

@MartinTheFirst [media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWU9G677r2Y]

@xSharp .... "the experiment is too small to conclude anything" xD and they said it's digested slower, not "not at all"... lol

@MartinTheFirst i cant memorize everything.. lol but there you have it

@SecondHomeByTheSea i know, ive hated how image results work its awful, stop only showing the prettiest things or places and start showing real life and how not everything is their definition of "perfect"

@Kanimaz Thank you! I even find some of the worst American Idol and xfactor contestants the most entertaining lol

@SecondHomeByTheSea youre welcome!

@SW-User youre welcome c:

@SW-User yes but also more people probably wouldnt if they didnt feel bad about how they looked or threatened. some just dont want strangers to see images of them and thats fine, but my main concern is how fake everything is any more. plus photographers should be able to to take images (with permission of course) or normal everyday people more often then they do with models.

Some do. I guess it depends on what you're googling.
The point of a model is to represent the artist's (the photographer's) point of view. Maybe the problem is a lack of creativity. @Kanimaz

if thats what you believe then ok, i wont argue, im simply saying it doesnt always need to be model material

@Kanimaz see then that's exactly what you're saying. "not model material", with that you mean "less attractive"

@MartinTheFirst no im saying most models are portraying what most people would call attractive, others see it as fake looks, some even find models unattractive. im not saying anything about attractive levels however.

@Kanimaz but what things? What search terms?

well ive tried, shy, scrawny, ordinary, nerd, geek, worker, teen, guy, woman, people wearing glasses, people, etc. and heck if you google ordinary people it shows pictures from a movie called ordinary people

@Kanimaz I see. Maybe include "amateur" in there