This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
If men had a womb, cervix, tubes, uterus and such and no penis, and she had a the penis in genetics, nothing would be different. It would have been that way since the beginning of time and we would think nothing of it.
@badapple I am not sure it would matter what, or how they they would be referred to. Mother's for one. You are applying modern pronoun standards to a event that would have stared at the beginning of time. And would have long been accepted as how life comes in to the world. But that is not to say that females have wombs and males do not. He brings life into the world, she impregnates him. It does not, by definition make him a female and her a male.
The masculine/feminine roles (which suck) or ancient times would not change. Just how life comes into the world as that is the topic.
The masculine/feminine roles (which suck) or ancient times would not change. Just how life comes into the world as that is the topic.