This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Some have come close here.
Nothingness is a good concept. But it incomplete. On the rims of the universe is nothingness. Whether the universe is expanding or contracting it matters not. At the very edge there is nothingness. Yet by the fact that the universe is not a stasis that means that time exists even there.
Another has said a dot and even gives references explaining everything is representated with in that. Yet isn't that more a representation of all of time?
My concept is void. It is more than nothingness and total opposite of everything. It is, was, will be and never is. Forever outside of totality, before the beginnings and long after the very ends. Think of it as a dimension without dimension.
That is what I believe is the opposite of time.
Nothingness is a good concept. But it incomplete. On the rims of the universe is nothingness. Whether the universe is expanding or contracting it matters not. At the very edge there is nothingness. Yet by the fact that the universe is not a stasis that means that time exists even there.
Another has said a dot and even gives references explaining everything is representated with in that. Yet isn't that more a representation of all of time?
My concept is void. It is more than nothingness and total opposite of everything. It is, was, will be and never is. Forever outside of totality, before the beginnings and long after the very ends. Think of it as a dimension without dimension.
That is what I believe is the opposite of time.