Global Warming?

@Zer0Point why do we always have to call people names? That is the best that you can come up with? I say something that you don't agree with so I am something negative. Can live an long productive life doing great things and in a single moment I get called a name. Very mature, but this is why we have so much hate.

@Capt11 some people are hateful 😔

@Capt11 Why do you come here for answers on this topic? There's lots of good scientific documents available. This confusion is why most people now call it "Climate Change" instead of "Global Warming". These winter extremes actually prove the data much more than they detract from it.

@HypnoChode I see new name new package but same product. The climate changes every year. What can you use and it stay the exact same? Nothing and we all know that we can use statistics in the ways that leverage our agendas.

@Capt11 And what sinister agenda are they pushing with this supposed climate change theory?

I never said it was sinister. Do you need a hug?
Fact
1.people have dumped waste on this planet for many years.
2. Our generation has done more to clean it up.
3. Wind energy and solar panels everywhere.
4. 33% of homes recycle.
5. Building materials are made from recycled goods.
6. Hybrid cars go further on less.
I feel good about climate change, but it only mentioned when people want to scare us. It is like the adult monster in the closet.

@Zer0Point The sinister agenda is destroying the US economy and its sovereignty via EPA regulations. Regulations every other industrialized country's government pays lip service to. But you can't use logic or reason with people who believe symbolic EPA regulations are going to make a difference in the environment. But then again a sucker is born every day who actually believes feeeling good about themselves equivocates with results. Yes suckers brought up on google whose main trait involves virtue signaling who are always short on facts, reality and results. But seemingly are always quick to comment on something they know nothing about.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/07/15/epa-chief-admits-obama-regs-have-no-measurable-climate-impact-one-one-hundredth-of-a-degree-epa-chief-mccarthy-defends-regs-as-enormously-beneficial-symbolic-impact/

@Capt11 I agree put up your links, argue your point, but name calling proves nothing.