One last soul searching wordy post for today
There's a number of points that I am trying to touch on, and this is something that can trip me up, i'll try to explain as clearly as I can:
All these points are to me important for varying reasons, beyond my occult purposes, they are supposed to not mean anything to anyone else.
So then when there's an addressing of one of those points which are of a different flavor than the other points made before and after what was addressed, I can sometimes make the mistake that the point that was addressed is unconnected to the other points, which express other variant dispositions more directly, and critically.
There is for me, no easy way to say what is felt to be important, if I find something easy to say, it's not to be considered worthwhile to have said it. Each phrase of expression is to be a sort of weeping and gnashing of the teeth, it can only make sense and be worthwhile to me if it is that way.
Weeping and gnashing of teeth is merely a phrase I got the hots for, right up there with the worm shall not die.
Let us say there are 20 points in all, when one is addressed, I never know if any of the other points is considered by the addresser, but most probably not, so the point here is to make a strong case of the fact that one point that's addressed means 19 other points stand in line to refute the point that was addressed. Or something, I like to use the word refute, and that is a point, I am enamoured by words so as to use them liberally without strict adherence to their dictionary meaning, and how that word relates or not relates to what is being stammered about.
With overemphasis an emphasis is still made, as if by screaming.
The natural result, ought to be silence, there's nothing anyone can say that would shift the centre to outward motion.
For the subject being dwelt on involves all of the emotions in extremo.
All these points are to me important for varying reasons, beyond my occult purposes, they are supposed to not mean anything to anyone else.
So then when there's an addressing of one of those points which are of a different flavor than the other points made before and after what was addressed, I can sometimes make the mistake that the point that was addressed is unconnected to the other points, which express other variant dispositions more directly, and critically.
There is for me, no easy way to say what is felt to be important, if I find something easy to say, it's not to be considered worthwhile to have said it. Each phrase of expression is to be a sort of weeping and gnashing of the teeth, it can only make sense and be worthwhile to me if it is that way.
Weeping and gnashing of teeth is merely a phrase I got the hots for, right up there with the worm shall not die.
Let us say there are 20 points in all, when one is addressed, I never know if any of the other points is considered by the addresser, but most probably not, so the point here is to make a strong case of the fact that one point that's addressed means 19 other points stand in line to refute the point that was addressed. Or something, I like to use the word refute, and that is a point, I am enamoured by words so as to use them liberally without strict adherence to their dictionary meaning, and how that word relates or not relates to what is being stammered about.
With overemphasis an emphasis is still made, as if by screaming.
The natural result, ought to be silence, there's nothing anyone can say that would shift the centre to outward motion.
For the subject being dwelt on involves all of the emotions in extremo.
46-50, MNew