Observations and random thoughts
The infinite from a human understanding looks finite as the supra-humanly understood finite appears infinite.
When the infinite which is contained within a finite space, the things explaining it and going into it shall seem as if there is no end.
The progress of humanity applies as it proceeds with their discoveries onto the thing which from long ago was stated.
Within the framework which designates things as finite or infinite.
To see things from all angles, and what are the things you want to focus on, but that which is within the framework above.
For example: the framework is the area of inquiry, and as it touches or implies everything else, the terrain covered by the inquirer is also everything, but the centre of inquiry is like a HQ, headquarters.
To engage with a text as opposed to engaging with other live human beings, this is what i feel is the way for me. I observe that most social engagement is fundamentally flawed, 2 positions endlessly stating what they think and neither truly thinking along the lines of the other or that which could find room for both or an all.
The insane part of my studies is that i think i can attain an all approach towards the HQ of an inspired text, as it also touches on the all directly or through implication.
Destined to fail, i regardless see that the attempt is worth it, for a basic love of the material itself. It gives a relaxed sense of direction.
When the infinite which is contained within a finite space, the things explaining it and going into it shall seem as if there is no end.
The progress of humanity applies as it proceeds with their discoveries onto the thing which from long ago was stated.
Within the framework which designates things as finite or infinite.
To see things from all angles, and what are the things you want to focus on, but that which is within the framework above.
For example: the framework is the area of inquiry, and as it touches or implies everything else, the terrain covered by the inquirer is also everything, but the centre of inquiry is like a HQ, headquarters.
To engage with a text as opposed to engaging with other live human beings, this is what i feel is the way for me. I observe that most social engagement is fundamentally flawed, 2 positions endlessly stating what they think and neither truly thinking along the lines of the other or that which could find room for both or an all.
The insane part of my studies is that i think i can attain an all approach towards the HQ of an inspired text, as it also touches on the all directly or through implication.
Destined to fail, i regardless see that the attempt is worth it, for a basic love of the material itself. It gives a relaxed sense of direction.
SW-User