For all the Darwinists out there some food for thought.

@SW-User Or you could simply laugh at Darwin and move on. It simply can't happen as Darwin imagined and the fact that in the fossil record multiple 'life form explosions' where new forms of life spring into existence with no ancestors in the fossil record. Huge leaps in very short time frames that are simply unexplainable using a darwinian model.

@hippyjoe1955 I am not suggesting he got every detail correct…others after him have established details that go well beyond his thoughts.

He was a catalyst…

If Berlinski does field work, let me know.

@SW-User Those details are nonsense and anyone with a modicum of understanding of organic chemistry knows it. Sadly it has become the established doctrine that no one questions. BTW I didn't post Berlinski because he is a biologist. I posted him because he is a philosopher. Listen to what he is saying about the philosophy not the science.

@hippyjoe1955 being a philosopher is great..

His work in my world, is an exercise in intellectual gymnastics.
..
It’s much like a teacher becoming an administrator in a school..

They did teach, but now they don’t…

He earned a science degree, but took another path.

What I stated isn’t wrong regarding Darwin’s work..

But it’s your post, and your fantasy.

Your source on this can’t be taken seriously either..

@SW-User Never commented about you. I commented about Darwin's lack of understanding. Those who follow him are not doing so based on science. They are doing so based on philosophy.

@hippyjoe1955 Darwin was a failed theology student…all he did was observe …like elementary students observing leaves during the fall on a walk outside…..that’s what science is..do all of his observations have to stand the test of time? Obviously not, why so? Because scientists continue to study and experiment..the field grows like that..

@SW-User Hr was also a poor observer. He did have a vivid imagination though.

@hippyjoe1955 which of these is problematic?

Conclusions of Darwin..

Members of a species vary?
Offspring inherit traits from parents?
Species adapt to their environment?

@SW-User members of one species to not evolve into another species.

@hippyjoe1955 that’s not what he said

Moths have different color wings.
Horses are one species…

@SW-User In effect it was. One of his followers suggest that a whale began as a dog.

@hippyjoe1955 incorrect

@SW-User What I said is true. Sad that you want to deny what is in science text books.

@hippyjoe1955 I have teacher’s editions of all sciences ..I don’t want to embarrass you.
I don’t care what a follower suggested.

The gnostics had some weird ideas as well..
But that didn’t factor into the political agenda of building the NT canon.

We aren’t reworking inherit the wind.

@hippyjoe1955

That’s why whale bone structures show legs..


Derp.