Saying much can be like saying nothing
And that is something i like to try to do, and nothing is another word for everything. The poles apart are so close in the realms of the immaterial.
With succinctness and brevity, where ideas are crystallized is a wonderful thing too.
That can be a feature in the nothing/everything.
The fragmentary is a model for both lazy and enlightened, the latter may have migraines so they have to keep each thing brief, that was how it was for my 2nd favorite thinker.
This wake period begins with the overnight period, and i just more or less feel like writing lengthy posts, getting around to things by just starting anywhere and slowly and voluminously covering ground that will always be re-treaded with tiny differences.
Books aren't everything, but they are lettuce say the larger part of the solitary whole.
In this funky world we now call current, the internet throws another dimension upon the solitary. It is both a part of it and extends one into another stratosphere of wonder and intrigue.
People based, frozen in time and perpetually fluid in the now, is what makes SW and interactive things as easy to give up as heroin addiction.
When we're faced with an ought we respond mostly in a negative, i want to be different, and i see what my potential purpose here is to be an example of someone reacting celebrationally to a whole lotta oughts.
We ought to make the best use of the tools at our reach.
We ought to be terribly interested in things we may have dismissed as things we thought we'd forget about in school.
We ought to process data in a multitudinous way, where various viewpoints are allowed room to breathe, respect, and don't demean, listen and understand instead of belittling and ridiculing.
We ought to be able to say we were wrong, to be like gymnastically adept to marvelous feats in the illustrative context of verbal speech and what words classically signify.
We ought to not give a hoot about what others think, if we are grounded enough in our own orientation of knowledge that we need not superfluous confirmations.
We ought to be clear that what we think is just that, and isn't what has to be thought by anyone else, unless we honestly think it's for the good of others, and even then know that noone really knows enough to do so.
We ought to create stupid rules for ourselves, and then smash them to bits, as a game to prepare us for confronting the more real challenges life has in store.
We ought to know by now, that knowing means more knowing, and it doesn't end, and to end it is when all the negatives become reality on a subjective level.
With succinctness and brevity, where ideas are crystallized is a wonderful thing too.
That can be a feature in the nothing/everything.
The fragmentary is a model for both lazy and enlightened, the latter may have migraines so they have to keep each thing brief, that was how it was for my 2nd favorite thinker.
This wake period begins with the overnight period, and i just more or less feel like writing lengthy posts, getting around to things by just starting anywhere and slowly and voluminously covering ground that will always be re-treaded with tiny differences.
Books aren't everything, but they are lettuce say the larger part of the solitary whole.
In this funky world we now call current, the internet throws another dimension upon the solitary. It is both a part of it and extends one into another stratosphere of wonder and intrigue.
People based, frozen in time and perpetually fluid in the now, is what makes SW and interactive things as easy to give up as heroin addiction.
When we're faced with an ought we respond mostly in a negative, i want to be different, and i see what my potential purpose here is to be an example of someone reacting celebrationally to a whole lotta oughts.
We ought to make the best use of the tools at our reach.
We ought to be terribly interested in things we may have dismissed as things we thought we'd forget about in school.
We ought to process data in a multitudinous way, where various viewpoints are allowed room to breathe, respect, and don't demean, listen and understand instead of belittling and ridiculing.
We ought to be able to say we were wrong, to be like gymnastically adept to marvelous feats in the illustrative context of verbal speech and what words classically signify.
We ought to not give a hoot about what others think, if we are grounded enough in our own orientation of knowledge that we need not superfluous confirmations.
We ought to be clear that what we think is just that, and isn't what has to be thought by anyone else, unless we honestly think it's for the good of others, and even then know that noone really knows enough to do so.
We ought to create stupid rules for ourselves, and then smash them to bits, as a game to prepare us for confronting the more real challenges life has in store.
We ought to know by now, that knowing means more knowing, and it doesn't end, and to end it is when all the negatives become reality on a subjective level.
SW-User