When are they going to get around you having men and women boxing matches?

@QuietExit: You dont think the genders should be equal?

Yes lol but I think men & women boxing each other is taking it too far. Not that it can't be done.. just why? Lol

@QuietExit: You saying you wouldn't want to watch a man and a chick, trained in boxing going at it?

I personally don't like watching fights, period... but I also don't need to see that to know that there are strong, badass women in the world.

@QuietExit: Exactly!! And we need to have them fight some strong, badass men. It'd be awesome! Imagine all the blood.

@Allelse: lol I'm sure it will be a thing soon enough

@QuietExit: Hell! Get the trannies in the ring too!! :D

@Allelse: You dislike women, then ?

@bijouxbroussard: Oh yeah I hate em! 😐 That's why I support gender eqaulity. 😕 With men and women boxing.

@Allelse: [quote]And we need to have them fight some strong, badass men. It'd be awesome! [b]Imagine all the blood[/b].[/quote]

You dislike women, then ?

@bijouxbroussard: No I dont dislike women, I enjoy bloodspots! Male blood, female blood, Its all red to me. I think you're the one who's confused here. You think so little of women that it never occurred to you that a woman could beat a man in a boxing match?

@Allelse: Some women [b]could[/b] beat some men. But while I've no doubt that men and women are intellectually equal, and in terms of running a country that's generally what counts, physically men (overall) tend to be stronger. I don't kid myself that the basic design has changed that much.

@bijouxbroussard: Why do you think so little of your own gender?

@Allelse: It's not a question of thinking little of my gender. It's a biological reality. Women's and men's [b]bodies[/b] are not the same. That's kind of the point, right ? But intellectually we can match you and have proven it. That's why women and girls deserve to be educated, and to run for leadership positions, because those are [b]not[/b] based upon physical strength (although arguably in our country they're not always based on intellectual prowess, either).

But seriously, our leaders would all be young athletic men, if it was based upon physical strength.

@bijouxbroussard: No chicks in the army then?

@Allelse: Women, you mean ? Not if they stop using weapons. Maybe I misunderstood. Wasn't your question about boxing, where people are [b]unarmed[/b] ?

@bijouxbroussard: Nah chicks. I think you're wrong. I think chicks and guys could box. Oh sure men are psychically stronger but boxing isn't just about strength. And my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are very naive not only when it comes to your own gender and boxing but you dont seem to have much of an idea of what it involves to be a soldier. But that's alright! I suggest you do abit of reading up.

@Allelse: You dislike women, might as well admit it. You wouldn't speak so disparagingly if you did. 🙄

I've known a few boxers, male and female. Known more than a few soldiers---also male and female.

@bijouxbroussard: Its alright to admit that you know very little about boxing, soldiering or your own gender. 🙂 And no I dont dislike people based off of their gender.

@Allelse: Then, why won't [b]you[/b] admit your own ignorance and arrogance ? I do dislike [b]those[/b] qualities in people, as well as misogyny, so I'll likely be bidding you farewell. Peace.

@bijouxbroussard: Why do you think so little of your own gender?