This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Pinkstarburst We won’t stand accountable for what ancestors and other relatives have one. We are responsible for what we do.
@cherokeepatti I’m just going by the original poster. He seems to have some kind of inside connection 🤷🏻♀️😉
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Pinkstarburst OK
RocktheHouse · M
@cherokeepatti Only God knows our heart. For most of her life, she was a colonizer. She sat on the royal throne while Brits continued to Rob and exploit Africa as well as the Middle East and other parts of Asia.
SomeMichGuy · M
@RocktheHouse
Do you know who undertook the wars?Who declares these under the British constitutional monarchy?
Do you even realize
[quote]Between 1945 and 1965, the number of people under British rule outside the UK itself fell from 700 million to 5 million, 3 million of whom were in Hong Kong.[202][/quote]
She was NEVER "Empress of India"...
Do you know who undertook the wars?Who declares these under the British constitutional monarchy?
Do you even realize
[quote]Between 1945 and 1965, the number of people under British rule outside the UK itself fell from 700 million to 5 million, 3 million of whom were in Hong Kong.[202][/quote]
She was NEVER "Empress of India"...
RocktheHouse · M
@SomeMichGuy Are you addressing me? Because I don't see anywhere in my post where I stated she was "Empress of India."
SomeMichGuy · M
@RocktheHouse You seem to think that the kings & queens under the *constitutional* monarchy are running things. The British system separates the politics from the monarch/head of state. And ever since CRI was beheaded--and you can go to the spot where it happened, in London!--things are even more different than after the [i]Magna Carta[/i].
She was a symbol.
She was a symbol.