KitCloudkicker · 13-15, M
My own word
There is no building without a builder.
Nor painting without the painter.
What makes people think there can exist a universe, without a Creator?
Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father, but by Me."
God didn't leave us to guess about how to have salvation and eternal life. Why would we take man's word over eternal God's? Since when, is man smarter or wiser than God?
Nor painting without the painter.
What makes people think there can exist a universe, without a Creator?
Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father, but by Me."
God didn't leave us to guess about how to have salvation and eternal life. Why would we take man's word over eternal God's? Since when, is man smarter or wiser than God?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@LadyGrace
Amen, sister, amen! One day soon, they'll find out different and we'll pity them.
God didn't leave us to guess about how to have salvation and eternal life. Why would we take man's word over eternal God's? Since when, is man smarter or wiser than God?
Amen, sister, amen! One day soon, they'll find out different and we'll pity them.
DocSavage · M
Another curious thing, I been meaning to ask you.
Why did god wait until Adam sinned to throw humanity out of Eden ?
Lilith left before Eve was even created. She defied god , disowned him.even brought forth Demons.
Sounds a lot wors than eating from one little tree in a garden,
Why did god wait until Adam sinned to throw humanity out of Eden ?
Lilith left before Eve was even created. She defied god , disowned him.even brought forth Demons.
Sounds a lot wors than eating from one little tree in a garden,
DocSavage · M
View 22 more replies »
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
Science still points to God, that is the Truth until proven otherwise.
Atheist don’t need to prove anything,
Science still points to God, that is the Truth until proven otherwise.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
It’s already been proven chuckle head.
Nothing in any field of science acknowledges any aspect of god. He goes against every single rule of existence. God is completely the opposite of reality to the point that there is no way to define him in any way compatible with physical reality
It’s already been proven chuckle head.
Nothing in any field of science acknowledges any aspect of god. He goes against every single rule of existence. God is completely the opposite of reality to the point that there is no way to define him in any way compatible with physical reality
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Science still points to God, that is the Truth until proven otherwise.
No it doesn’t. It says god’s not dead , because he never existed in the first place. You lie again
Natalie15 · F
I'll take "not man's word." Is that Ken Ham's position?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Natalie15
What made you think that Ken Ham is super human?
It's a miracle that Ken Ham has managed to be super human
What made you think that Ken Ham is super human?
Natalie15 · F
@GodSpeed63 his word is better than
'man's word"
'man's word"
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Natalie15
Ken Ham is only relating to God says and not what man says.
his word is better than 'man's word"
Ken Ham is only relating to God says and not what man says.
DocSavage · M
If science points to god , why do you reject its conclusions?
The process we call science , is the break down of the observation of how the elements work .Any natural phenomena was there first, All science does is determine how the established process works. If god created it, science explains how it functions.
Why are you so hostile against it ?
The process we call science , is the break down of the observation of how the elements work .Any natural phenomena was there first, All science does is determine how the established process works. If god created it, science explains how it functions.
Why are you so hostile against it ?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
I don't reject it's conclusions, just the false interpretation of those conclusions from evolution scientists.
If science points to god , why do you reject its conclusions?
I don't reject it's conclusions, just the false interpretation of those conclusions from evolution scientists.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Evolution is the conclusion. The only other one presented is magic, remember ? That one doesn’t work.
Evolution is the conclusion. The only other one presented is magic, remember ? That one doesn’t work.
DocSavage · M
Question for you.
Sinse you consider science acceptable (to a degree with Ken Ham ) what exactly is your problem with it ?
Is it the long standing argument of man and apes ?, the seven days of creation ? Or do you have to prove god, in order to have an afterlife ?
Sinse you consider science acceptable (to a degree with Ken Ham ) what exactly is your problem with it ?
Is it the long standing argument of man and apes ?, the seven days of creation ? Or do you have to prove god, in order to have an afterlife ?
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Then you have a problem with god. One of you is lying.
Then you have a problem with god. One of you is lying.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
According to me , duh.
You say that science points to god. Yet you cannot show one single example.
The thing that separates truth from delusional faith is evidence. You don’t have any, and god can’t provide you with any. All you have is evasions. So put up or get lost. We don’t need you fantasy world.
According to me , duh.
You say that science points to god. Yet you cannot show one single example.
The thing that separates truth from delusional faith is evidence. You don’t have any, and god can’t provide you with any. All you have is evasions. So put up or get lost. We don’t need you fantasy world.
AnnaBunny · 18-21, F
I'll take smart man over Ken Ham man.
DocSavage · M
Hint : make sure you don’t represent either side.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment