This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
If science points to god , why do you reject its conclusions?
The process we call science , is the break down of the observation of how the elements work .Any natural phenomena was there first, All science does is determine how the established process works. If god created it, science explains how it functions.
Why are you so hostile against it ?
The process we call science , is the break down of the observation of how the elements work .Any natural phenomena was there first, All science does is determine how the established process works. If god created it, science explains how it functions.
Why are you so hostile against it ?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage
I don't reject it's conclusions, just the false interpretation of those conclusions from evolution scientists.
If science points to god , why do you reject its conclusions?
I don't reject it's conclusions, just the false interpretation of those conclusions from evolution scientists.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Evolution is the conclusion. The only other one presented is magic, remember ? That one doesn’t work.
Evolution is the conclusion. The only other one presented is magic, remember ? That one doesn’t work.