Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can Man Create A Living Cell From Scratch?

[media=https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9rF5UogLUmI?feature=share]

[media=https://youtu.be/Dn6i91NRMu8]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
It's hard to say. Probably not with current technology. There's nothing in the videos you posted about it just some guys going on about flat earth type stuff.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@HobNoblin
There's nothing in the videos you posted about it just some guys going on about flat earth type stuff.

What flat earth type stuff, flat earther?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@HobNoblin
It's hard to say. Probably not with current technology.

If man didn't create the living cells, then where did they come from?
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
@GodSpeed63 There are various theories, protinoid microspheres was popular in the 90s. What the current theory is I don't know.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@HobNoblin
What the current theory is I don't know.

You don't know and yet you deny the obvious answer that living cells came from God. The fact is, you can't bring yourself to believe in Him.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 life is a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwin evolution.
It is immediately obvious that basic cells (there are many variants) evolved from not-quite cells... chemical systems a smidgen away from being what we now consider to be a cell.
Why do you feel that would be difficult?
You seem unable to understand that life doesn't have to be cellular in order to be life. Perhaps you are making that error because cellular life has become ubiquitous, but that shows only that cellular life gives great evolutionary advantages.
As for magical entities poofing cells (and presumably themselves) into existence - such fictions have zero explanatory power and do nothing to advance our understanding
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
life is a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwin evolution.

According to whom? Please, answer the question above.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 I have answered the 'question above'. Did that startle you? Are you yet again pretending?

perhaps you missed this: You certainly seem determined to ignore it 😂

"It is immediately obvious that basic cells (there are many variants) evolved from not-quite cells... chemical systems a smidgen away from being what we now consider to be a cell"

According to whom?

According to me, and because you have not offered an alternative definition, my definition stands as valid.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
According to me, and because you have not offered an alternative definition, my definition stands as valid.

No it doesn't, you have yet to disclose the source of your reasoning nor have you explained how man can create a living cell from scratch.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Reasoning? It's a definition, not a discourse!
Do you ever read anything other people write in response? How rude!
If you don't accept the definition, explain the specific basis of your objection.

I have already offered you basic insight into the evolutionary development of cells, so why are you going on about creating a cell in the laboratory? What does that have to do with anything?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
why are you going on about creating a cell in the laboratory? What does that have to do with anything?

A lot since you don't know where living cells originated from. Please don't tell me that I don't know where they come from, I do know where they originated from but you don't hear it. It goes against everything those fairy tale books you've read.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 I've already told you... but you continue to feign ignorance.

"It is immediately obvious that basic cells (there are many variants) evolved from not-quite cells... chemical systems a smidgen away from being what we now consider to be a cell"

(You are feigning, right..?)
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
I've already told you... but you continue to feign ignorance.

Careful, Newjaninev, your ignorance is showing. You tell me nothing. I'm talking about the first living cell that appeared in the beginning. Where did that first living cell came from? Think.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 In the beginning of what?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
In the beginning of what?

You tell me. Remember, you're supposed to be the expert.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 No... you used the phrase, so I asked you

Suddenly you want to run away from your own words.

Why is that?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
Suddenly you want to run away from your own words.

In other words, you're telling me that you don't know or don't want to know.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Why are you saying 'in other words'?

You made a statement and I asked you a question about it.

A question you are now avoiding.

Is that because you don't know what you mean when you say 'in the beginning'?

Can it be that you're admitting you don't know what you're talking about?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
Why are you saying 'in other words'?

Why can't you admit that your wrong and that you don't have a clue of what you're talking about?