Religion & Spirituality

No Notifications

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Are Some Scientists Continue To Discredit The Reputation Of God's Science?

There are those who believe in the big bang theory, that all this came about out of thin air, where's their evidence? there are those who believe that aliens visited this planet to colonize it and that's how life began on this planet. Where's their evidence? Then there are those of us who believe that God created the heavens and the earth and ordained science as a means to show us His creation and how He's made it all work. Fortunately some, through science, are coming around to realizing that all this can't come about on its own and that it was created by God. Science will always point to God regardless of what people may believe.

Those scientists, who would rather believe the lie of Satan, cannot discern their left hand from their right thereby ruining the reputation of science. They They make up all sorts of fairy tales for science to fit their agenda on evolution but can't do it. The Truth of God's science comes out every time. Some of these fallible scientists don't realize that, in order for the knowledge of science to grow, it has to have a source. Otherwise, it will not grow and rot away. Scientists are not infallible but God is infallible.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

LadyGrace · 70-79 Best Comment

The best scientists can do is make a hypothesis based on: their own observations, existing theories, and information they gather from other sources. Scientists use their hypothesis to make a prediction, a testable statement that describes what they think the outcome of an investigation will be. They really have no proof that the Big Bang caused creation.

The Big Bang theory is the scientific explanation for how the universe began. That's just it. It's only a theory. Whereas, proof of God's existence is found in the experience.

View 2 more replies »

ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M

@LadyGrace I mean big bang and fine-tuned. are only theories. But without a big bang, the fine-tuned universe theory collapses

LadyGrace · 70-79

@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP you seem to contradict yourself here. First you say big bang is just a theory and then you say without a big bang the fine-tuned universe theory collapses. Maybe I'm just not understanding your wording I don't know.

ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M

@LadyGrace they are both theories, but one depends on the other. If big bang was disproven, that would eliminate the fine-tuned universe theory. Which I would find a bit sad, because I find unity between my faith and the theory says that very (seemingly) arbitrary attributes are just perfect for sustaining life.

LadyGrace · 70-79

Thanks for BC.

Subsumedpat · 36-40, M

Many go by what there is scientific evidence for. Otherwise there are many different religions which all say theirs is the one true one but no proof of any, whu believe one over another.

BlueSkyKing · M

@Subsumedpat This guy posts because he’s a big attention seeker and has no use for the methodology. Which is strictly a human idea.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@Subsumedpat @BlueSkyKing

Many go by what there is scientific evidence for.

Scientific evidence itself doesn't make you a liar, your own interpretation of that evidence that does. Without the Spirit of God, no man can interpret what science is declaring to him.

ninjavu · 51-55, M

Who created your god? Where's your evidence?

View 3 more replies »

ninjavu · 51-55, M

So where's your evidence to support what you claim is actually true?

It's what I believe. Sound familiar? The difference between me and you if that I don't push my belief in those make-believe beings on everyone else, like you push your belief in your make-believe being on the rest of humanity.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

It's what I believe. Sound familiar?

No.

The difference between me and you if that I don't push my belief in those make-believe beings on everyone else, like you push your belief in your make-believe being on the rest of humanity.

You got that wrong. I'm pitting the Truth of God against the lie of Satan. I'd love to have people believe in the Truth of God, then they will believe in the Truth.

ninjavu · 51-55, M

@GodSpeed63 I'll just post what I usually reserve for the reaction to your replies: 😂 It's really all you deserve. 🙄

MoveAlong · 70-79, M

How novel. A person who accepts his god on faith asking those who may not for evidence.

LadyGrace · 70-79

@MoveAlong The very best scientists can do is make a hypothesis based on: their own observations, existing theories, and information they gather from other sources. Scientists use their hypothesis to make a prediction, a testable statement that describes what they think the outcome of an investigation will be. They really have no proof that the Big Bang caused creation.

The Big Bang theory is the scientific explanation for how the universe began. That's just it. It's only a theory. Whereas, proof of God's existence is found in the experience.

MoveAlong · 70-79, M

@LadyGrace Yes, you are correct. the Big Bang is an unproven theory. Creationism is an unproven theory also.

LadyGrace · 70-79

@MoveAlong The Bible presents creation as a narrative of God directly creating the universe and life, which is fundamentally different from the scientific concept of a "theory" that requires testable evidence and can be modified based on new findings, making creationism, based on a literal interpretation of the Bible, not considered a scientific theory. Faith is under our voluntary control. Faith carries conviction. But that conviction is not well described as 'theoretical'.

ImperialAerosolKidFromEP · 46-50, M

I see you've twigged to the atheist technique of dismissing anything you don't like as "fairy tale"

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

Most scientists don't read the Bible as a science text, nor did Christians until quite recently.

So?

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Add a comment...