Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It is said by the faithful that God has the right to do whatever he pleases to humans because he created them. I disagree. Let's explore that idea:

If you create a true artificial intelligence, are you morally justified in doing whatever you want to that creation? Can you hurt them if you want?


Imagine a hypothetical AI being of the kind we see in science fiction; truly real persons that are artificially created.
Is it a moral action for you to cause that being to suffer if they do not meet your standards? Are you morally right to do that? They are utterly your creation, they do not exist without your act of creation. Does that mean you can torture them or abuse them or subjugate them and still be morally justified?

That is the argument that theists use for god having the right to inflict suffering on humanity.
Is it still a satisfying argument when we remove the conceits we allow for god?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
What does it mean to be human? Once you define that you can answer the question
@TryingtoLava

I would say rather what does it mean to be a person. Human is just the only kind of person we've yet encountered.
@Pikachu Personhood is a legal definition. Some countries have considered making chimpanzees legal persons.
@LeopoldBloom

It does have a legal definition but i think we're considering the philosophical definition here.
@Pikachu It's pretty clear who decides on the legal definition. Who decides on the philosophical definition? I think we need to be as precise as possible in defining words and making sure we're in agreement.
@LeopoldBloom

Definitely.