Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Two Big Bangs?

How did the universe begin? The average evolutionist will immediately reply with “a big bang.” But that story might be changing (no surprise—evolutionary ideas change frequently, as we’ve documented time and time again!). A new hypothesis suggests the universe began not with a big bang—but with two big bangs, “one for ordinary matter and another delayed one for dark matter, originating from a separate form of energy.”

This new hypothesis is an attempt to answer “two cosmological mysteries”:

The first is understanding in detail how the Universe came into existence. The second is the nature of dark matter, a substance which is thought to be far more prevalent than all the stars and galaxies in the Universe.

Now, no one has observed this “dark matter”; rather, its existence is inferred based on some unusual phenomena in the heavens (you can read more about dark matter from a creation worldview in this article by astronomer Dr. Danny Faulkner). But how was this hypothetical matter created? Well, perhaps, according to these scientists, by a second big bang creating vacuum dark energy “which became the origin of dark matter.”

Reading through the popular science summary of this new hypothesis feels like reading through an explanation of the science fiction behind some new superhero movie! It reads exactly like fiction—one big bang produced energy which eventually, somehow, formed all the matter in the universe, and then maybe a month or so later, a second big bang created a different form of energy that formed a different kind of matter. It sounds like fiction because it is!

When I saw the headline reporting on this new paper, my first thought was that Christians who compromise God’s Word with the big bang will now have to modify the Bible again to fit a second big bang in somewhere! After all, the Bible doesn’t teach one big bang, let alone two!

Now, I have some Christians tell me, “The Bible does teach a big bang—God said, ‘Let there be . . .’ and bang, there was!” But the Bible doesn’t just say, “In the beginning, God created,” and then leave it up to our investigations and imaginations to fill in all the details. Rather, God gave us a detailed description of exactly how God created—by the power of his Word. God spoke, and it was . . . and everything appeared in the order God commanded it to. This is important because the big bang and the Bible contradict each other when it comes to the order of events:

More guess work from evolution scientists who want God out of the picture. Will they ever learn that they can't always get what they want?

[media=https://youtu.be/n-wAypUwvTc] This video has apo0logetics to think about. Be praying for you.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
There is no such thing as an "evolutionist," My little imbecile. That is an invented term coined by creationists.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne It helps them feel on an equal footing with those who look to science for an answer. As if creationist theory is actually supported by more than hot air..😷
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne @whowasthatmaskedman
There is no such thing as an "evolutionist,"

Tell that to the evolutionists.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
As if creationist theory is actually supported by more than hot air..😷

I'd tell you to prove it but you'll try to find some lame excuse not to. If you're going to post on here, make sure that you know what your talking about.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 As usual. You make the claim, tell me to prove you wrong and dont hve to prove a thing yourself. Thats not even lazy science. Thats story telling..And I will prove you wrong in the future, as soon as my Delorian is back from the detailers.. (Prove me wrong)😷
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@GodSpeed63
Tell to the evolutionists.
There are no evolutionists. There are only people who comprehend science, and I am sorry to say that you are not one of them.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman @CorvusBlackthorne
As usual. You make the claim, tell me to prove you wrong and dont hve to prove a thing yourself.

I don't make claims, I give testimony to the truth. As far as getting you to prove your claims, I'm not like you. My brothers and sisters and I have shown God's work time and again. If you don't accept the evidence given to you, that's your problem.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@GodSpeed63
I don't make claims, I give testimony to the truth.
Then you will have no problem providing evidence.
If you don't accept the evidence given to you, that's your problem.
You have not provided any.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 OK. Now I will use small words here to be sure I wont be misunderstood.
"🐂💩".. You have no proof. You dont even carry the scars of proof. The only thing preventing me calling you a lying hypocrit is the likelyhood that you are a delusional fool. Make your claims based on faith or belief. But claiming them as proven in any sense is pure Bull$h*t..😷
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
OK. Now I will use small words here to be sure I wont be misunderstood.

Just make sure that you understand them, @whowasthatmaskedman, You're confused enough as it is. I'll use some of your small words so you'll understand: You have no proof, none. zip, nothing to support your claims.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 I make no claims.. You are the one claiming there is something there..😷
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
I make no claims..

Why am I not surprised? You make claims all the time and yet, you don't prove any of them. Why is that?
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 Dont be obtuse. You claim there is a God. I say "Show me" and you pull some routine Penn & teller would be embarrassed to explain. Go away..😷
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
You claim there is a God.

You claim that God doesn't live. Show me.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
We would if we could find any. They don’t exist.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
We would if we could find any. They don’t exist.

Prove This claim of yours to be true, Doc.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@GodSpeed63 Prove that I am not an extraterrestrial raven.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne I have seen it written. It must be true,,😷
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 When confronted with your own claims and asked to support them, you immediately divert away by inventing a fiction that the other person said something they didn't actually say.

Not only is that unethical and craven, it still leaves you either unwilling or unable to address the other person's question.

So much for you and your little magical entity... keep running.

and you will post a case in point in one... two... three...
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Easy. No one but you uses the term. You use to describe people who don’t support creationism. We call those people “normal” or “rational”
Not evolutionist.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
We call those people “normal” or “rational”

Since when is killing one another normal or rational?
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
It’s always been normal. Pretty much every life form on the planet has to kill something to survive. It’s the nature of the world .Predator or prey. Evolution exist so species can continue and grow.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Easy. God has no heart beat, pulse, blood pressure. No respiratory, no body temperature , his eyes don’t respond to light, no detectable brain activity.
by legal definition, “he be dead “ therefore he’s not alive.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
Easy. God has no heart beat, pulse, blood pressure. No respiratory, no body temperature , his eyes don’t respond to light, no detectable brain activity.

Prove what you say is true, Doc.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@GodSpeed63 Prove it is a lie.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
OK, if a doctor declares some one has no pulse or heart beat. Zero blood pressure, no body temperature, no respiratory, no pupil dilation, no response to cardiac stimulation, no body functions ( no body ) the doctor would be completely justified in pronouncing him dead, and if he signed a death certificate, under the law ( unless you can show otherwise ) god is both medically and legally “not living” that’s at least two valid claims .
If you wish to dispute them, then you will have to provide tangible evidence . Lots of luck.