Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If Skeptics Claim That God Doesn't Live, Why Do They Hate Him So Much?

For years skeptics claim that God doesn't live and yet, they get their noses out of joint when we share the love of Christ. Why?

How can Skeptics hate someone they claim isn't there? Why do they hate us for sharing Him on here? What's the big deal?

Another thing is: they've been hollering for proof that God lives and when they get it, they reject it? Where's the logic in that?

And yet, when we challenge them to present proof of what they're claiming is true, they get their noses out of joint in frustration and start to mock and ridicule us hoping we will go away. We will not go away.

Why can't the skeptics prove their claims are true instead of arguing with us about them? Is it really that hard for them to do?

Remember, in a discussion, we try to get at what's right but in an argument, we try to get at who's right. In this fallen world of ours there is only the Truth of God and the lies of men. You share the Truth, you're right - you push the lie, you're wrong. It's that simple.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Truth demands to be tested. Where is the rational discussion? An unbiased mediator? The better evidence is what counts, your anecdotal statements single out one and no possibility of alternatives. We’re all children of The Enlightenment, like it or not your emperor has no clothes. Demanding strong evidence supersedes all superstitions. We don’t make the claims and it’s always easier to prove.

Evidence = Detection, measurement, testing, falsification. Anything less isn’t evidence.

Skepticism is about applying methodology. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And the burden of proof is on you.