This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
How does science point to God if there's always zero evidence for God?
Oh, it's Ken Ham: the mentally ill guy who thinks dinosaurs made lemonade for Adam and Eve.
Oh, it's Ken Ham: the mentally ill guy who thinks dinosaurs made lemonade for Adam and Eve.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User @jshm2
God is the Author of science. Paul tells in the book of Romans that Yahweh's handiwork is clearly seen in the heavens and the earth. Therefore there's no excuse for non-belief.
How does science point to God if there's always zero evidence for God?
God is the Author of science. Paul tells in the book of Romans that Yahweh's handiwork is clearly seen in the heavens and the earth. Therefore there's no excuse for non-belief.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 There's more to science than some ancient kook saying God must exist.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
Such as?
There's more to science
Such as?
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Science. Seeing nature and concluding God exists isn't at all scientific. Paul discarded reason and science in favor of promoting God. It's wishful thinking tantamount to a brazen lie to claim that God invented science.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
Why is it wishful thinking to see the work of God in mature and the heavens? Why is it do important to think that the one true God, who lives forever, is a lie?
It's wishful thinking tantamount to a brazen lie to claim that God invented science.
Why is it wishful thinking to see the work of God in mature and the heavens? Why is it do important to think that the one true God, who lives forever, is a lie?
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Nature doesn't indicate God and God didn't invent science. You can believe as you wish though. It's your right.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
It is your right as well. If you can explain to me how the trees were formed into their present form and how they've produced different fruits without intelligent design, I'd say that you're belief has merit.
Nature doesn't indicate God and God didn't invent science. You can believe as you wish though. It's your right.
It is your right as well. If you can explain to me how the trees were formed into their present form and how they've produced different fruits without intelligent design, I'd say that you're belief has merit.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 That's well covered by the ideas of opportune ranges and niche filling. The assertion of creation is frivolous compared to the obvious.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
Ideas don't cut it. The truth remains that God created the heavens and the earth.
That's well covered by the ideas of opportune ranges and niche filling.
Ideas don't cut it. The truth remains that God created the heavens and the earth.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 God is a whimsical idea completely devoid of evidence and rational argument. I presented two ideas that are verifiable. Still, please enjoy whatever turns you on- even if this means truth that isn't truth at all.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
According to whom?
God is a whimsical idea
According to whom?
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 If your hard intent is to abandon reason so that God can exist in your mind then you cannot be saved.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
You didn't answer my question.
If your hard intent is to abandon reason so that God can exist in your mind then you cannot be saved.
You didn't answer my question.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Yes I did. Those that value reason think God is merely a whimsical idea. You don't, and this leaves you free to believe in God. May you enjoy your thoughts.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
Lady, you left reason a long time ago when you decided to forsake the infallible Word of God for the fallible word of men.
Those that value reason think God is merely a whimsical idea.
Lady, you left reason a long time ago when you decided to forsake the infallible Word of God for the fallible word of men.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 It's religious men that concluded reason will only take us so far and thus we must turn to faith. If this isn't admitting to having largely downplayed the worth of reason then what is?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
I got news for you, Love, I'm not religious.
It's religious men that concluded reason will only take us so far
I got news for you, Love, I'm not religious.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Anyone that believes in God is religious, and anyone that doesn't understand this is misinformed.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Which means god also wrote evolution, and Ken Ham is committing a serious sin by denying it. And Darwin should be made a saint for enlightening the world to the glorious truth of natural selection.
God is the Author of science
Which means god also wrote evolution, and Ken Ham is committing a serious sin by denying it. And Darwin should be made a saint for enlightening the world to the glorious truth of natural selection.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SW-User
Not according to His Word.
Anyone that believes in God is religious
Not according to His Word.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Your interpretation of what a being not successfully shown to exist might have said isn't the deciding factor. Belief in afterlife caused by any agency best defines religion, and this can be a religion of one or many. Secular belief doesn't exclude you from being religious.
DocSavage · M