Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

The most important verse in the Word of God. If they don't believe this verse, they'll never believe the rest. However, the Word of God is the only recorded document that gives testimony to early man's history. Skeptics on here have tried to come up with an alternate document to push evolution as recorded history to replace the Word of God but failed to do so. Instead, they resorted to ridicule, mocking, and just plain displayed an act stupidity. Why? If they can't produce anything to support what they think is the true history of early man, then why go through the trouble of acting stupid to discredit the early history recorded in the Word of God? It's not logical at all. Plus, it's a futile attempt to change what has already been established in the history of mankind. No offense, but this is what I've observed on here.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
Here you go:

Charles Darwin, On The Origin of Species

http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F387&viewtype=text&pageseq=1

Followed by many other studies accumulating more evidence and fine-tuning the explanation, but this would be the one to begin with.
@SW-User My thoughts on this subject. https://similarworlds.com/spirituality/god-creator/4354757-Evolution-Confusion-vs-Creator-God

Curious how you would feel about that.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SW-User
Charles Darwin, On The Origin of Species

Charles Darwin was never an authority on history as all know.
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 Charles Darwin was a brilliant and groundbreaking scientist, as everyone knows.
@SW-User Yep. But he's not as brilliant as his Creator.
SW-User
@LadyGrace But he was using the brains his Creator gave him, to better understand the creation.
Darwin found it difficult to believe in a Christian God, but he also could not bring himself to abandon the belief that the universe was not created by an intelligent force. At least, He could not believe, as Dawkins does, that the universe came about by chance.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@LadyGrace Do you mean Charles Darwin? I am trying think who Robert Darwin was.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SW-User
Charles Darwin was a brilliant and groundbreaking scientist, as everyone knows.

He probably was but he still had flaws like the rest of us and didn't know his history very well.
@GodSpeed63 Yeah, you got that right. He was no historian.
SW-User
@LadyGrace Historians do not investigate evolution; that goes waaay back before any history as we know it.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@SW-User
Historians do not investigate evolution; that goes waaay back before any history as we know it.

Would you call the Word of God a myth and why?
SW-User
@GodSpeed63 No, I wouldn't call the Bible a myth.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 In the beginning of what?
DocSavage · M
@SW-User
I would.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage
I would.

Call it what you will, Doc, but you still have nothing to show for your claims.
@hippyjoe1955 Thank you. 😂
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63In the beginning of what?
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Yeah, I do. But not until you give me the light year you owe me.
DocSavage · M
@newjaninev2
The fairytale. “Once upon a time …”
DocSavage · M
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@DocSavage You lost again, Doc. As usual, you have nothing.