Skeptics, Where Is Your Evolution History?

@redredred [quote]Where is it written that the Bible is true?[/quote]

Where are your historical records that show that the accounts in the Word of God are myths?

@GodSpeed63 Thanks for pointing out that you don’t understand the rules of logic. People (like you) who make claims of special conditions bear the burden of proof. People (like me) who ask questions bear no such burden.

Now, about my question…

@redredred [quote]Thanks for pointing out that you don’t understand the rules of logic. [/quote]

Whose logic.

@GodSpeed63 Logic devoid of emotion or inconsistency. You know, like Mathematics. The logic that designed the device your using in this discussion.

@GodSpeed63 hes right .
Maybe you mean "reason"?

@GodSpeed63
In all the other myths about the other gods. Duh !

@GodSpeed63 Still waiting, where is it written that the Bible is true?

@redredred
He won’t answer, never does, never will

@redredred @DocSavage [quote]Still waiting, where is it written that the Bible is true?[/quote]

The Word of God, where else. Still waiting, where is evolution's history during the times that the Word of God was written?

@GodSpeed63
Title :”World History & Evolution before so called Word of God”

Here’s a a first edition, even signed by the author.

@DocSavage [quote]World History & Evolution before so called Word of God”[/quote]

How do they know what happened back then, in Genesis?

@GodSpeed63
There were other god there. Didn’t you read chapter three ?

@DocSavage [quote]There were other god there. Didn’t you read chapter three ?[/quote]

Lost again, Doc, as usual, you have nothing.

@GodSpeed63
You can’t read cuneiform, Can you ?

@GodSpeed63 same way as they know what happened in the genesis of the bible : stories told by mouth , and ancient tablets written by holy scribes.

Im not sure if youre aware, but the geneisis of the bible is an ancient sumerian story, written WAY before the hebrews got hold of it, , and had more detail to it.

You have just been shown a proof, yet you dont even look it up to see of its true.

Claiming "no proof" when someone has just shown proof , is, deliberate denial.

Surely youde appreciate how ancient the story, and how far back it goes.
In fact, youde love that its about 6000 years old.

Denying incredible truth, that elaborates on what you believe, to include not only the making of man, but how he 'evolved' into man , seems nothing short of ....well, foolish.

'Your word of god' book has a more intricate, diverse, and millenially older heritage than you know .
You could have gained wisdom, but you chose not to.

Surely a child of god is suposed to keep an open heart and conscoiusness to the word of god?
And even your bible says god wrote on tablets.
Very much like the example you were shown .

@Nunatak
Godspeed63 doesn’t actually read the book, he just post the videos. Then denies everything.

@DocSavage i sometimes feel that he misses the whole point of our consciousness of "god".: light and love .

I feel he is angry and combative, and it makes me wonder why.

@Nunatak [quote]I feel he is angry and combative, and it makes me wonder why.[/quote]

Where'd you get that idea from?

@GodSpeed63 where do i get that from?
I get it from many the instances in the way you respond to people.

Even the title wording of this post is combative.
Its interesting that you dont see it in the way you seem to rile people up, in their responses back.
Its like your signature characteristic here. 🤷‍♀️

@Nunatak [quote]I get it from many the instances in the way you respond to people.[/quote]

I'm sorry that you see it that way. How long have you been on here?

@Nunatak
[quote] I feel he is angry and combative,[/quote]
Nah, he’s just stupid

@GodSpeed63 about 6 and a half years.

@DocSavage ive come to my own conclusion, he argues coz hes bored.

Some people like that. I used to. You know, get a rush from feeling youve out argued someone.
Took me a while to learn not to be so combative.
Still working on it 😏

@redredred @DocSavage [quote]Logic devoid of emotion or inconsistency. [/quote]

Well, that leaves you guys out.