A Summary of the Previous Video

[quote]Since the video itself was too long for the opposing team to bear[/quote] You neglected to mention the fact that the video was in Russian and none of us could understand a word of it. Just the sort of case-weakening thing you'd forget to mention.
[quote]Ахиллесовы пяты эволюции
[Рекомендуем включить субтитры (кнопка справа внизу видео), чтобы видеть перевод экранных текстов][/quote]
https://similarworlds.com/spirituality/4319062-Evolutions-Achilles-Heels?sort=1

Wow, they found 15 PhD scientists who rejected "evolutionary theory," but they didn't say what subject their PhDs were in! The USA has over 3 million PhDs, so it looks like it's 15 vs 3 million, LOL!!!

"We asked each scientist what is the worst thing evolution has to handle in your discipliine?" So we're already granting that evolution explains 99.9999% of observations. That's good. Do you offer any other testable theory with a 99.9999% success rate? I didn't think so. Sorry, there's always going to be a little weirdness out there, mistakes in record keeping, mistakes in measurement, typos.

Truth is, in science, if you want to reject a testable theory that's 99.9999% successful, you need to offer a testable theory with a better than 99.9999% success rate. And you ain't got one.

But this video doesn't offer any such testable theory. Instead, it sets up a giant strawman fallacy; the fallacy that any testable scientific theory needs to be perfect. Sorry, dudes, perfection is not how science works. Not even with the so-called "Law" of Gravity.

David Catchpoole says, in the video, that "natural selection can only operate on what is existing, and it can only operate to [i]remove [/i]what is existing." That's DEAD WRONG.

The quote clip from John Sanford says essentially that information is complicated; but makes no points and draws no conclusions. I wonder why they included it??

Then the two dudes go on to claim that science says "the origin of life has nothing to do with evolution." That claim, too, is DEAD WRONG. It's a giant strawman fallacy within the overall strawman fallacy.

OK, ten minutes in when they bring up the holocaust I bailed out. I didn't pursue any details of how they tried to blame Nazism on Darwin; sorry dude, I've found enough holes already without engaging with that steaming truckload of bull excrement.

So called "creation science" is NOT testable, not falsifiable. So called "creation science" essentially says "whatever you measure, whatever you observe, God made it that way." Such a theory can't be falsified, so it's not in the realm of science. Want another non-testable non-falsifiable "theory"? Check out the Flying Spaghetti Monster. FSM theory says whatever you measure or observe, the FSM reached out with a noodly appendage and made it look that way. FSM "theory" thus explains everything just as well as "creation science" does. Thus it deserves equal standing with "creation science" yet your video never once mentions the AmAzInG 100% success rate of FSM "theory," [b]LOL!!![/b]

Good people do good things, bad people do evil things. But it takes religion for good people to do evil things.

"It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right, but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.”
― Isaac Asimov

You love lying dont you. You claim to win every argument. You actually lose every argument. You try to claim science. You do everything but science. You claim others are saying things they normally wouldn't when it was you calling people stupid and insane on the last post. It was you acting out of character.
You say perfect love drives out fear but you are not loving. Also how can someone who lives in fear of god claim to be living without fear. You have been afraid so long that those feelings you have you think everyone has. It's due to your Christian lack of empathy that you cant understand that other people don't see and feel the things you do. And they certainly don't have your delusions and diseases. After all a child that has been beaten all his life will growing thinking pain is normal. You have live with your sickness for so long you think that is how everyone acts.
Get some (medical) help before you become a good Christians like MTG, Boebert, Trump, Gaetz, Jim Baker, Greg Locke, The Transformed Wife, Kenneth Copeland, etc... You know charlatans, pedos, and wanna be murderers.
If that is who you want to side with you are officially the enemy.
After all Christians realize they themselves are so evil that they need not just forgiveness from their victims, not just from another person. But they require God to kill himself in order to forgive their evil. I mean multiple Christians even on here admit that Christians deserve death. Christians already know they are immoral. So repent.

Incidentally, I notice you use the phrase ‘opposing team’.

That’s unusual... how do you imagine this to be working?

Do you feel that creationism in some way challenges the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection?

Certainly the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection challenges creationism, but that’s inevitable, I suppose, and it seems to be pretty much one-way traffic in that regard.

Still, as I say, just list the pertinent points and we’ll work through them

If this is in response to the Achilles heel video, it still remains impossible for me to decide if this is an accurate summary.

I was going to watch the original video, but you had replaced it with a Russian language version before I got the chance. Even though you refuse to watch or read anything you disagree with, I don't mind stepping out of my comfort zone.

Yep, I fully agree with them; Darwinism is wrong. That's why it's now called the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. As they correctly pointed out, Darwin had no idea of the mechanism behind his theory. That's the thing about science, new data leads to improvements in theories.

It's interesting they spoke about Hitler, but failed to mention the eugenics movement in the US which was an inspiration for Hitler's plans (https://www.nicholls.edu/cheniere/2021/05/20/eugenics-in-the-united-states-the-forgotten-movement/). But this probably doesn't fit their agenda. Eugenisists may have cited Darwinian ideas as the basis for their program, but this was and is a total bastardisation of the underlying theory. Up there with people claiming to use science to prove a flat earth or creationism.

Oh, cool. So, what are the specific elements of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection that the video refutes?

Just list them, and we’l work through them together

Thank you for sharing

Learn how to spell.

You are a hateful bloke for someone who believes in a god. Some of us don't have time and or desire to watch fiction.