Answering The Skeptics

@DocSavage the problem for creationists is that they can’t get the science [i]wrong[/i].

Whenever they try, science keeps revealing the duplicity inherent in their claims.

@newjaninev2 [quote]the problem for creationists is that they can’t get the science wrong. [/quote]

Why is that a problem?

@GodSpeed63
Tell you what. Here’s a challenge that an Atheist can answer. Let’s see if you can .
With all his powers, what is one thing that Yahweh can’t do, that even a five year old child can ?

@DocSavage [quote]With all his powers, what is one thing that Yahweh can’t do, that even a five year old child can ?[/quote]

Lie.

@GodSpeed63 If God can't lie he isn't all powerful🤷‍♀️

@DocSavage change its mind

@GodSpeed63
The answer is something you must have been told hundreds of times. “ GET LOST”

@newjaninev2
Yahweh doesn’t have a mind, neither does Godspeed63

@GodSpeed63
Lying is what Christians do all the time, where do you think they learned it ?

@DocSavage

@GodSpeed63 [quote]Why is that a problem?[/quote]

Creationists desperately need to get the science wrong, which is why they constantly try to pervert it.

Science shows the ridiculous nature of their claims

@newjaninev2 [quote]Creationists desperately need to get the science wrong, which is why they constantly try to pervert it.[/quote]

The only ones perverting science is you guys. You don't know how to read the evidence and facts that it puts before you, maybe you don't want to know. Real science will always confirm our testimonies, that Yahweh lives and His Word is True.

@GodSpeed63 Prove it! Until you do, your opinion is totally worthless.

@GodSpeed63 ‘Read’ the evidence?

Seriously?

Let’s choose a topic and look at the evidence, and then see if we can find a [b]complete, consistent, and coherent explanation[/b] for that evidence.

@GodSpeed63 It’s ridiculous that creationists claim evidence has to be ‘read’ or ‘interpreted’ or ‘understood in light of’ and that the evidence in some way ‘confirms’ a pre-existing conclusion.

@newjaninev2 [quote]It’s ridiculous that creationists claim evidence has to be ‘read’ or ‘interpreted’ or ‘understood in light [/quote]

What's wrong with that? Light exposes what is true and what isn't true. Therefore, scientists can come to a more accurate conclusion.

@GodSpeed63 Except that scientists are trying to come to a ‘conclusion’, and certainly not a pre-determined conclusion. Scientists seek a complete, consistent, and coherent [b]explanation[/b] of the available evidence.

@newjaninev2 [quote]Except that scientists are trying to come to a ‘conclusion’, and certainly not a pre-determined conclusion.[/quote]

That's where they miss out. Recognizing that God created the heavens and the earth and has ordained science as a means for us to study His creation is true science indeed.

@GodSpeed63 lol! Fortunately, the science works just as well without invoking unnecessary magical entities.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]Recognizing that God created the heavens and the earth[/quote]
Where's the evidence to support that [b]opinion[/b]? Hint: there isn't any.